Hand Analysis from WPT Five Diamonds: Eddy Sabat vs. Dan Smith
It took place between Eddy Sabat and Dan Smith, with Gary Benson involved until the turn. Although Smith went on to win, losing this hand meant needing to survive a coin flip later on, and thus could have cost him the tournament. Here’s how it played out.
A small three-way pot gets very big
Sabat limped on the button, leading Smith to complete in the small blind and Benson to check his option in the big blind.
The flop came out A:s 8:d 4:s and play checked around to Sabat, who bet about 1/3 pot. Smith and Benson both called.
The turn was the 3:h and now Smith led out with a much larger bet, around 2/3 pot. Benson folded and Sabat called.
The river was the 5:c, Smith checked, and Sabat made a huge, nearly pot-sized bet, sending Smith into the tank.
A polarizing bet
I was not watching the final table on television, so I have not seen Smith’s hole cards, though some sort of A seems likely, perhaps A3. Regardless, when Sabat bets so large on the river, Smith’s exact holdings become all but irrelevant. Sabat’s bet is so large that he surely has either a monster or air, and Smith’s hand is now nothing but a bluff catcher. But could Sabat be bluffing?
Reading Sabat’s hand
Imagine yourself in Smith’s position, and consider Sabat’s likely range. Key factors include limping on the button, betting on the two-spade flop, and flat calling on the blank turn when Smith shows strength.
All of these actions are consistent with a hand containing two small spades, and so the most obvious thing to put Sabat on is a whiffed flush draw, perhaps with the 8:s for a middle pair he’s now decided is no good.
In fact, Sabat had 7:s 6:s for a flush draw plus a gutshot, which hit on the river to give him the nuts. Smith surely knew this was a possibility, but it’s very tough to fold to a polarizing bet when there are likely bluff hands in your opponent’s range and only one precise value hand.
This is what allowed Sabat to go for maximum value here, where an average player might have bet much smaller. It’s a classic example of Level 3 thinking: understanding what your own range is from the opponent’s perspective, and employing deception when your actual hand falls in the smaller part of that range.
Register at PokerForums.org and keep the conversation going!
BetOnline Poker – The Only Place to Play on a Sunday
The only place to play poker on a Sunday is with BetOnline Poker. BetOnline has…
BetOnline Launches 250k Guaranteed Poker Tournament
Betonline is launching a new online poker tournament for a massive $250,000 guaranteed on Sunday,…
2021 World Series of Poker Online Circuit Announced
The World Series of Poker and GGPoker have announced the 2021 schedule of online WSOP…
Partypoker Follows In WSOP Footsteps Amid Push To Be More ‘Green’
With the World Series of Poker (WSOP) leading the way in adopting sustainable efforts seen…
Do Indian Poker Players Have A Better Chance Of Winning At Smaller iPoker Rooms?
The online poker market in India has grown exponentially since 2016 and the market has…
Female Asian Poker Players Inspired By Part Time Pro Winning WSOP Ladies Event
South Korea's Jiyoung Kim emerged victorious in Event #47: $1,000/$10,000 Ladies No-Limit Hold'em Championship at…