|

10-19-2007, 10:23 PM
|
 |
NL20 Grinder...
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 7,007
Limits Played: $0.10-$0.25 NL
|
|
No offence, but this sounds really lame.
|
| Sponsored Links |
|

10-20-2007, 12:02 AM
|
|
Fish Food
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9
|
|
Designed For Serious Players
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRE8R
No offence, but this sounds really lame.
|
This Concept is designed For ther serious Players and is the Innovative Concept .In due Course of time when Player will be acquainted with this ,It will be a routine and there after certainly it will acceptable in the Industry.
" Innovative Concept ,takes time to get the acceptance"
Thanks
|

10-20-2007, 12:06 AM
|
 |
NL20 Grinder...
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 7,007
Limits Played: $0.10-$0.25 NL
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by armonitoring
This Concept is designed For ther serious Players and is the Innovative Concept .In due Course of time when Player will be acquainted with this ,It will be a routine and there after certainly it will acceptable in the Industry.
" Innovative Concept ,takes time to get the acceptance"
Thanks
|
If you say so.
|

10-20-2007, 07:47 AM
|
|
Fish Food
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9
|
|
Over Ruling UIGEA(2006) 13th OCT2007
One Has to bear Some Cost to find out the way
|

10-22-2007, 03:03 AM
|
 |
Mike McDermott
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: with your sister/wife/mom/gf
Posts: 4,718
Limits Played: $0.02-$0.04 Limit
|
|
didnt read the rest of teh explanations, but will say this:
its prolly the most idiotic idea one could imagine. applied to a poker room.
|

10-22-2007, 06:49 AM
|
 |
Mike McDermott
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Luton, England
Posts: 4,685
Limits Played: $2-$4 NL
|
|
Its not innovative.
It is tried and tested and fails miserably every time because degenerate gamblers will gamble far more than they can ever afford to pay back and some type of people will lose money and never intend to pay it back. The system then collapses. Am I going to be satisfied that someone who fails to pay me my money to feed my kids with is "blacklisted"? No.
|

10-22-2007, 07:12 AM
|
|
Fish Food
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9
|
|
Reply
Quote:
Originally Posted by WotaWaster
Its not innovative.
It is tried and tested and fails miserably every time because degenerate gamblers will gamble far more than they can ever afford to pay back and some type of people will lose money and never intend to pay it back. The system then collapses. Am I going to be satisfied that someone who fails to pay me my money to feed my kids with is "blacklisted"? No.
|
Here the concept is different, where Player Play with their Own Friends ,secondly ,the game is designed to Play with in their own state .
Any Known person is not allowed to enter your own Group.
There are many Feature and will provide you the download link if you require.And Certainly there is a option to set there own Rule Pertaining to Financial security between the member of the group .
|

10-22-2007, 07:31 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,991
|
|
People usually play online because they dont have home games around them or people to play with, this is going to fail.
|

10-25-2007, 03:23 AM
|
|
Fish Food
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9
|
|
Present Scenario
Hi,
In US sitiuation is Bad of the Poker Industry,due to the enforment of UIGEA, which refain Poker Operator along with the Bank to do any type of financial trasaction.Hence no one can get any type of Payment from playing Online Poker in US .hence the concept of Group play has developed.
|

10-25-2007, 07:52 AM
|
 |
Poker Professional
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,519
Limits Played: Play Money
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by armonitoring
Hi,
In US sitiuation is Bad of the Poker Industry,due to the enforment of UIGEA, which refain Poker Operator along with the Bank to do any type of financial trasaction.Hence no one can get any type of Payment from playing Online Poker in US .hence the concept of Group play has developed.
|
Not exactly. The UIGEA cannot refrain any poker operator from doing any type of financial transaction. The sites are outside US jurisdiction. The UIGEA prohibited US financial institutions from electronically sending money to any entity involved in online gambling. The banks can still receive money from online gambling entities, IIRC. Regardless, the gambling sites can still send paper checks to US residents who can then deposit or cash the checks at any US bank.
US players still have the option to send international money orders to "deposit" at the gambling sites. It just takes so long for mailing that we find other ways to deposit.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:38 AM.
|
 |
|