Cake Poker
Home
News
Articles
Site Reviews
Book Reviews
Interviews
Chat
Tournaments
60% Rakeback
50% RakebackNew!
125% Rakeback
Probabilities
Glossary
Poker Gear
Links
Advertise
User Name  
 
Password
Cookie?  
 
 
Poker Players on Launchpoker.com
LaunchPoker.com provides you with all the information you need about this year's WSOP event, from the 2008 WSOP schedule to the latest 2008 WSOP updates.
Online poker reviews of rooms such as Full Tilt Poker, Poker Stars and Titan Poker.
Extras

RakeBack
PokerListings

Go Back PokerForums.org > The Player's Lounge > Sports & Games > How bout them Patriots

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2007, 08:48 PM
Mike McDermott
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Virginia University
Posts: 3,150
Trade Rating: (1)
Limits Played: Play Money
Send a message via AIM to SeanyBullets1
Default

Kitna throws 4000 yards in Martz's system. Martz makes QBs and makes WRs. Where as these 3 guys you speak of that would be #1s on other teams?

Moss? Well obviously. But who the fuck knows with him.

Stallworth? Worked OK in Philly but that was because of need.

Welker? What? That makes Furrey a legit #1.

Caldwell? Yup, he's really shined when given the opportunity.
__________________
BOSS
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Personal Poker Pal
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2007, 09:00 PM
the alex's Avatar
PokerForums God
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nort Side o' Shi-kawgo
Posts: 7,961
Trade Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to the alex Send a message via MSN to the alex Send a message via Yahoo to the alex
Default

The NFL is a piece of shit league. I said before this last season on this very message board that the parity in the NFL was an illusion to cover up the fact that expansion has depleted the quality of play.

Welker caught 65+ balls with close to 700 yards in a by committee receiving corp last year. Look around the NFL. Put him on BAL, PIT, CLE, KC, SF, CHI, or MIN, just to name a couple and he's the #1 WR on the club. I'm not saying that Welker and Stallworth are great. I'm saying that the NFL's so bad that besides Indy, there's no question that NE is gonna have the most yards in the air.

Don't even tell me about Detroit's pass game potential. That's as tired as discussing the Cubs starting pitching was a year ago. Instead of "watch out," it's "show us and until then, you're busts."
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FaDi View Post
GodFadiR (12:32:45 AM): but lets be honest
GodFadiR (12:32:48 AM): who doesnt wanna fuck me
WotaWotaWota (12:33:22 AM): I do
WotaWotaWota (12:33:27 AM): in tehanus
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2007, 09:15 PM
Mike McDermott
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Virginia University
Posts: 3,150
Trade Rating: (1)
Limits Played: Play Money
Send a message via AIM to SeanyBullets1
Default

Ummm...Detroit did prove it. They were a top 5 passing offense last season. Furrey had 98 receptions for over 1000 yards.

And there's no way the Pats outpass New Orleans, either. I can't believe I left them off of it. Fact is, Brady just isn't a 4000/30 guy. He's a winner, best in the game, but he won't outproduce Manning, Palmer, Brees, or Bulger.

Welker would be #3 on BAL behind Clayton, Mason, and probably #4 behind Oregon 2nd year man Demetrius Williams.

SF has Darrell Jackson now, thankyouverymuch

Wes Welker over Hines Ward??? Wes Welker over Nate Washington??? Wes Welker over Santonio Holmes??? HAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAH

The ONLY reason Welker had that OK season is BECAUSE he was in a committee. People focused on McMichael and Chambers. He'd never EVER make it as a #1. Not at 5'9" 185 lbs.

I want some of everything everyone is on.

This discussion is getting ridiculous now.
__________________
BOSS
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2007, 09:53 PM
HSM's Avatar
HSM HSM is offline
Poker Expert
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: West Haven, CT
Posts: 1,398
Trade Rating: (1)
Limits Played: $0.05-$0.10 NL
Send a message via AIM to HSM Send a message via MSN to HSM
Default

I never said Welker was a great player, I said he had a great year last year, he started off as the #3 receiver behind Chambers and Brooker but ended up #1 through superior numbers. However, I think this is all irrelevant as he will probably be the Pats kick returner and either their #3 or #4 receiver.
__________________
Pairs of 2s is back!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2007, 10:03 PM
the alex's Avatar
PokerForums God
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nort Side o' Shi-kawgo
Posts: 7,961
Trade Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to the alex Send a message via MSN to the alex Send a message via Yahoo to the alex
Default

I missed the Jackson acquisition during Draft day because I refuse to watch drafts. Either way, Jackson's production with Alex Smith in SF won't be much greater than Welker's in Miami. He'll have less receptions, get around the same amount of yards and score more touchdowns as a "go to guy."

Ward's too small to conquer age. By the end of the year, he'll look like an overplayed Slot Man. Holmes can't catch in traffic and he never will.

As for Detroit, I compare their passing game to the Cubs pitching because they did well for a year, but they're depending on time bombs. If you think Kitna can throw 600 passes and have less than 30 INT's at his age like he did last year, you're crazy. That'll lower their ToP which'll lower the amount of plays they can run and less times throw Williams the ball. Williams'll be doggin' it by Week 9. I remember Jeff Blake making Carl Pickens look like Jerry Rice one year. Or to get closer to the discussion, Scott Mitchell and Herman Moore.

There's still no reason to believe that the Colts and Pats aren't #1 and #1A in the NFL going into the season when before these pickups they were the 3rd or 4th best in the AFC behind San Diego and Baltimore.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FaDi View Post
GodFadiR (12:32:45 AM): but lets be honest
GodFadiR (12:32:48 AM): who doesnt wanna fuck me
WotaWotaWota (12:33:22 AM): I do
WotaWotaWota (12:33:27 AM): in tehanus
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-30-2007, 07:53 AM
Mike McDermott
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Virginia University
Posts: 3,150
Trade Rating: (1)
Limits Played: Play Money
Send a message via AIM to SeanyBullets1
Default

I disagree with your assessment of the Niners, alex.

SF playoff chance: 70%

Jackson, if healthy, will be good for 70-80 rec, 900+ yards, 7-9 TD

BANK IT!
__________________
BOSS
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-30-2007, 01:07 PM
Steve-O's Avatar
I donk off Wota's $$$
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,322
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

Obviously very few people on here know footbALL.

oF COURSE dETROIT, aRIZONA AND ANY OTHER 500 CLUB IS GOING TO HAVE BIG PASSING NUMBERS. tHEY SUCK AND ARE DOWN LATE AND CONTINUALLY THROW THE BALL. aT THE SAME TIME THE DEFENSE IS JUST GIVING UP 15 YARD PATTERNS ALL DAY.

Do you really think without manning Wayne and Harrison are gonna put up those numbers????

Believe me Moss is going to catch a lot of balls from Brady, as is Stallworth. And you don't give a returner the deal they gave welker. Get over the fact he's short and white, the guy is a football player.

You can put up those career stats all you want. Apparantly people can't improve or be under utilized by teams. Caldwell proved he can be a #2 receiver last season, and Gaffney given an opportunity showed he is a #4 or #5.

I'd like to see the defense that lines up against Moss, Stallworth, Ben Watson, Welker, and Caldwell in an empty backfield set.

NE had a strong offense last season with Gaffney and Caldwell. Every Analyst agrees they're now one of the top receiving corps in the league.

Guys Moss is only 30. He took a huge paycut that is incentive laden to go to NE. Do you think he's gonna be the Oakland Moss (which in itself would be an upgrade from the Pats of last year)
__________________
I find your response in this thread shallow, and pedantic...
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-30-2007, 01:31 PM
Mike McDermott
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Virginia University
Posts: 3,150
Trade Rating: (1)
Limits Played: Play Money
Send a message via AIM to SeanyBullets1
Default

I just love how people believe the addition of Moss is going to drastically change the way Belichick coaches a game.

NE will continue to be primarily run and defense. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

And Moss signed a one year tender. So he's not some saving grace.
__________________
BOSS
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-30-2007, 01:41 PM
Mike McDermott
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Virginia University
Posts: 3,150
Trade Rating: (1)
Limits Played: Play Money
Send a message via AIM to SeanyBullets1
Default

Im not saying Brady isn't a top 5 QB. He's a great producer.

I'm not saying Randy Moss doesn't have the ability to get back to his Minnesota #'s.

I like Stallworth, he proved his worth in Philly as a deep threat. He just can't stay healthy.

Yes the New England passing game IS greatly improved.

But this whole argument is about the men behind those two...which the fact remains, are still all underachievers and have proven NOTHING.
__________________
BOSS
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 04-30-2007, 03:32 PM
gder03's Avatar
Mike McDermott
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: with your sister/wife/mom/gf
Posts: 4,718
Trade Rating: (0)
Limits Played: $0.02-$0.04 Limit
Default

Aight; I don't follow football closely, I just bet $ on it

Now I will say in respect to the moss deal: That was a great pickup IMO. The reason it was great was Moss agreed to play for 3 million. IMO this is saying he is dedicated to the Pats, he proly could have gotten more $ else where, but instead he took the pay cut to play w/ the pats.

Furthermore, I dont feel any of the extra bagae will be there b/c look at corrie dillon. The guys who play for the pats know this is an organization you respect.

As for the rest of the receivers, IDK enough to comment.
__________________
I get more ass than a toilet seat. All shapes/colors/sizes.

caution:
http://girlvideos.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:10 AM.

   Designed by
      
No Deposit Bonus
Poker Strategy
Poker Rooms
PartyPoker Bonus Codes
Online Poker Strategy
Online Casino Bonuses
Pokerspiele
Casinos That Accept USA Players
Poker Rakeback
Full Tilt bonus code
Rakeback
Poker Site USA
Nowadays in the Internet the Players are looking for a good Casino Bonus to find the best possible options for online Roulette.There is now the option of RtlPoker and a nice Casino Bonus to play some other games then just Poker.
The ideal casino site for gokkasten and even online poker including online casino games that can be found on mijn online casino, your casino information site for when gambling online or even offline.
Party Poker bonus code & room review
Tony G talks about his experinces in his blog
REVIEW OF PARADISE POKER WEBSITE
Online Poker Room Directory and latest poker news
Best Online Poker info on Internet!
Ultimate Bet new 40% deposit bonus
Copyright © 2004-2008 PokerForums.org, a Merendi Networks Inc. project.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.