The BB was about 21/14 so far here. There were 20 left out of 90 with top 9 in the money.
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, 3+0.30 Tournament, 300/600 Blinds 75 Ante (8 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
MP1 (t7740)
MP2 (t10440)
CO (t5886)
Button (t13500)
Hero (SB) (t13310)
BB (t10950)
UTG (t21445)
UTG+1 (t11165)
Hero's M: 8.87
Preflop: Hero is SB with,
6 folds, Hero bets t13235 (All-In), BB calls t10275 (All-In)
Flop: (t22350),
,
(2 players, 2 all-in)
Turn: (t22350)(2 players, 2 all-in)
River: (t22350)(2 players, 2 all-in)
Total pot: t22350
Results:
Hero had 5, A
(one pair, fours).
BB had 10, A
(one pair, fours).
Outcome: BB won t22350
Is this a reasonable shove in this situation?
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 12
Thread: A5s in SB lateish in 90 plyr SNG
-
05-02-2009 #1
A5s in SB lateish in 90 plyr SNG
-
05-03-2009 #2Fish Food
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 3
Depends on how keen you are to get the game over with, I don't know the maths but I win more than my share on smaller tables and I'd be leary of pushing that hand preflop. Even learier of calling with it. Ace rag is a pretty shit hand in my unlearned opinion, suited doesn't really count for much.
Last edited by Da Kiwi; 05-03-2009 at 10:30 AM.
-
05-03-2009 #3
You have 22BBs vs a non-auful player with 18BBs which you cover.
I don't expect these guys to realise you will shoving here super wide so I think we can put them on KQ, KJs, 77+, ATo+ A9s+. for calling this.
Given there are 2BBs in the pot I think this is mathematically good. Though 18BBs is a lot here. Say you win 8/9 without showdown. (Villain on top 11% of hands). You are a 60-40 dog vs that range. Which I belive makes this good.
Interesting hand because I saw it and though "too deep to make this play" then realised I was wrong...
There are arguments for making this 1600 and folding though, as I think you've seen with 15BBs+ I tend to underraise habitually.Last edited by 22Fish; 05-03-2009 at 12:01 PM.
-
05-03-2009 #4
I don't like it. I'd min raise this hand. Or make it 1500 even. Anything that pushes back is going to be bigger then A5 at this level of the game, or atleast something you don't want to run a5 into (mid PP, AT+ etc)
-
05-03-2009 #5
-
05-04-2009 #6
open shove>open fold> raise fold
If he's aggro and capable of 3betting quite a bit, I put raise call 1stLast edited by sk8freak_21; 05-04-2009 at 01:24 PM.
the two best MTT training sites on the net
http://www.pokerpwnage.com/?ref=486
http://www.pokerxfactor.com/
-
05-08-2009 #7
it's def +EV and probably the best play readless, but with more info on BB raise/call and raise/fold could also both be viable
-
05-09-2009 #8
You have like 24BB's left, making moves like this is desperate and never a big hand. You're not going to push with AK with that big of a stack or atleast you shouldn't be. That's why it gives away so much information about your hand. You know it's not a big ace, you know it's not JJ+. I'm not saying I call this with AT, but I probably would with AJ.
-
05-09-2009 #9
4tun8, you just said you would call here as light as AJ, as would I, but I think given what you just said read my post and it makes sense why this is good.
-
05-09-2009 #10
See but the goal here is to steal the blinds. With his stack he's not making any moves, so you could just raise here and if he calls (stupid) or shoves then you play it from here. The goal here is to not go to the flop, I think shoving it here is wrong 95% of the time. It looks weak and it is weak with a weak hand. Doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure it out.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
, 
,
,
(2 players, 2 all-in)
(2 players, 2 all-in)
(2 players, 2 all-in)
, A
, A
(one pair, fours).
Reply With Quote

