TT on a suited board, played too aggressively?

[classickred]

PokerStars No Limit Hold-em Tourney ($3.00+$0.40), Big Blind is t20 (10 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from triple-t
(Format: PokerForums.org)

saw flop|saw showdown

MP2 (t2030)
MP3 (t1480)
CO (t1430)
Button (t1660)
SB (t1480)
BB (t960)
UTG (t1500)
UTG+1 (t1480)
Hero (t1500)
MP1 (t1480)
Hero is UTG+2 with .
Pre-Flop:
1 folds, UTG+1 calls, Hero raises to t80, 1 folds, MP2 calls, 1 folds, CO calls, 2 folds, BB calls, 1 folds.

Flop: (Pot=t350) (4 players)
BB checks, Hero bets t200, MP2 folds, CO folds, BB raises to t400, Hero raises to t900, BB calls All-In.

I lead out to see where I am - with three callers, is it a bad assumption to think no one has already made a flush? BB minraised after every one else folds - he didn't show great strength pf and unless he's made a flush, I'm thinking I'm ahead.

What's the opinion of my shove here? Would anyone have called or folded? I probably would have folded to a decent raise, but the minraise screamed weak to me.

Turn: (Pot=t2110) (2 players, 1 all-in)


River: (Pot=t2110) (2 players, 1 all-in)


Results in white below:
BB has Kd Ah, High Card, Ace
Hero has Tc Th, A Pair of Tens
Hero wins t2110 from Main Pot.

So he ended up having a nut flush draw - my assumption he was drawing to a flush was correct. I took the hand down but began wondering if this was too risky at this stage in the sng with no reads on the villain. Thoughts?

[triple-t]

I would have folded this. No need to get 60% of your stack in the middle with a marginal, at best, hand. Also, check-minraise usually means he has the goods, or a draw to the goods. In this case, PokerStove says you are in a coin-flip as a 50.2% favorite.

Board: 2h 4h 9h
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 49.798% 49.80% 00.00% 493 0.00 { AhKd }
Hand 1: 50.202% 50.20% 00.00% 497 0.00 { TcTh }