I would like to post this in river rats section, but it isnt really a bad beat, just bad cards and perhaps bad play.
PokerStars Game #7320444498: Tournament #37162583, $20+$2 Hold'em No Limit -
Level II (15/30) - 2006/12/06 - 00:27:33 (ET)
Table '37162583 39' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: alainlapaire (2755 in chips)
Seat 2: 73blond (1985 in chips)
Seat 3: tobben (2590 in chips)
Seat 4: SixFootEight (1180 in chips)
Seat 5: w00rM (1500 in chips)
Seat 6: ZappappaZ (1720 in chips)
Seat 7: savage62 (1875 in chips)
Seat 8: HDBlevins (1635 in chips)
Seat 9: lairyboy (1430 in chips)
alainlapaire: posts small blind 15
73blond: posts big blind 30
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to lairyboy [![]()
]
tobben: folds
SixFootEight: raises 30 to 60
w00rM: folds
ZappappaZ: folds
savage62: folds
HDBlevins: calls 60
lairyboy: calls 60
alainlapaire: folds
73blond: calls 30
*** FLOP *** [![]()
![]()
]
73blond: checks
SixFootEight: checks
HDBlevins: checks
lairyboy: checks
*** TURN *** [![]()
![]()
] [
]
73blond: checks
SixFootEight: bets 60
HDBlevins: raises 60 to 120
lairyboy: raises 330 to 450
73blond: folds
SixFootEight: raises 670 to 1120 and is all-in
HDBlevins: raises 455 to 1575 and is all-in
lairyboy: calls 920 and is all-in
*** RIVER *** [![]()
![]()
![]()
] [
]
lairyboy said, "lol"
*** SHOW DOWN ***
HDBlevins: shows [![]()
] (three of a kind, Sixes)
lairyboy: shows [![]()
] (three of a kind, Threes)
HDBlevins collected 500 from side pot
SixFootEight: shows [![]()
] (three of a kind, Aces)
SixFootEight collected 3615 from main pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 4115 Main pot 3615. Side pot 500. | Rake 0
Board [![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
]
Seat 1: alainlapaire (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: 73blond (big blind) folded on the Turn
Seat 3: tobben folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: SixFootEight showed [![]()
] and won (3615) with three of a kind, Aces
Seat 5: w00rM folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: ZappappaZ folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: savage62 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: HDBlevins showed [![]()
] and won (500) with three of a kind, Sixes
Seat 9: lairyboy (button) showed [![]()
] and lost with three of a kind, Threes
So can i fold this after i made the rereraise on the turn? My thinking was maybe one of them has a set but fuck it I call. I know this is not good thinking but I was semi-on tilt after some other bad beat and bad play.
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 1 to 10 of 12
-
12-06-2006 #1
Are you kidding me/Should I fold this?
-
12-06-2006 #2
Never easy to fold a set - they could have AQ and A6. Minus any reads I think its marginal either way. At a $200+NL cash game I would fold there after Id put in 2nd raise and they had both come in over the top of that.
-
12-06-2006 #3
I hate folding. I think I'm going to take it out of my game altogether. Things would be so much easier then.
Seriously, yes you should have. Could I? I doubt it.
-
12-06-2006 #4
Well that really was what i meant with my question. Obviously I should have folded, what I meant was could I or would you in the same position?
-
12-06-2006 #5
Hard fold. I would of called for sure. Happened to me in a live game. Had 66 and flop was x67. I raised got re-raised we went back and forth and I realized I could be beat so just cold called after the turn and river (it was limit). He had pocket 7s. Live poker is so rigged.
SnG Record
34 Entries
17 Cashes
6 1sts
-
12-06-2006 #6
someone else getting a set will only happen once every 100 or so times you get one.. so basically the poker gods just hated you
-
12-06-2006 #7
And if you can fold that 1 time every 100 you will increase your profit greatlysomeone else getting a set will only happen once every 100 or so times you get one.. so basically the poker gods just hated you
Seriously I think if you feel you are beaten 50% of the time given the action you need to fold. You shouldn't just feel resigned and think well I am 75% sure one of them has me beat but I'm not good enough to fold a set, guess I'm going broke. Especially in a tournament folding a winner is less of a mistake than calling with a loser.
-
12-06-2006 #8
im not saying calling is the only option i just lookd at the results i didnt see how it went down
in a 3 handed pot im sure one of them might have us beat
-
12-06-2006 #9
-
12-06-2006 #10
in a tournament, i dont think im folding this, ever.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
]
]
]
]
] (three of a kind, Sixes)
] (three of a kind, Aces)
Reply With Quote



