Villain is unknown. Reviewed this hand after a session and was wondering what others think about this line.

PokerStars No Limit Hold-em, Big Blind is $1.00 (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from triple-t
(Format: PokerForums.org)

saw flop|saw showdown

MP ($40.55)
CO ($322.60)
Hero ($107.25)
SB ($112)
BB ($100)
UTG ($45.50)
Hero is Button with .
Pre-Flop:
1 folds, MP calls, CO calls, Hero raises to $5, 2 folds, MP raises to $12, 1 folds, Hero calls.

Flop: (Pot=$26.50) (2 players)
MP checks, Hero checks.

Turn: (Pot=$26.50) (2 players)
MP bets $10, Hero calls.

River: (Pot=$37.50) (2 players)
MP bets $18.55 All-In, Hero calls.

It's fine. If the villain wasn't half-stacked, I'm betting the flop for sure.

prolly make it $6 pre, i open 3bb but iso bigger since people have a fetish for limp/calling hence we make another 1-2bbs here by isoing bigger

flop check is absolutely fine, i'd personally gaybet hopefully to induce some spaz from the fd and KK/QQ

turn and river play themselves obviously

cool. given what he had, this line was pretty much perfect, wanted to make sure I wasn't being results-oriented

if you put him on QQ+, you don't really have the right odds to setmine preflop. if he's lrr before or if you have been isoing his limps a shitton and expect him to spaz out a little, i would just shove it in preflop. otherwise i think you need to make a disciplined fold.

as played, postflop is perfect.

Originally Posted by MJPerry

Something wrong with this sentence...

the term "results-oriented" doesn't infer that the aforementioned results are negative.