Cake Poker
Home
Forum
News
Articles
Site Reviews
Book Reviews
Interviews
Chat
Tournaments
60% Rakeback
50% RakebackNew!
125% Rakeback
Probabilities
Glossary
Poker Gear
Links
Advertise
User Name  
 
Password
Cookie?  
 
 
Poker Players on Launchpoker.com
LaunchPoker.com provides you with all the information you need about this year's WSOP event, from the 2008 WSOP schedule to the latest 2008 WSOP updates.
Online poker reviews of rooms such as Full Tilt Poker, Poker Stars and Titan Poker.
Click here to play!
Extras

Cool Hand Poker. Get $350 Free!!
PokerListings

Go Back PokerForums.org > General > Professionals & Tournaments > PF Action: Gordon vs Harrington

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2006, 02:55 PM
Mr.McJ's Avatar
Stu Ungar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 2,404
Trade Rating: (0)
Default PF Action: Gordon vs Harrington

I've read Phil Gordon's little green book and I've read Harrington on Hold'em, and one thing I noticed was that each of them have a very different position on PF raising.

Gordon argues that you should not really vary your raise at all. He says beginners should always open the pot for a standard amount, 3bb. It doesn't matter if you're raising with A's or on a button steal, you should always raise the same amount.

Harrington, on the other hand, argues that you should randomly vary your raise between 2-5 bb.

I understand that they are both trying to accomplish the same thing, which is to conceal the actual strength of your hand, but which way do you feel would be more effective?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2006, 03:04 PM
WotaWaster's Avatar
PokerForums God
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Luton, England
Posts: 5,008
Trade Rating: (6)
Limits Played: $2-$4 NL
Send a message via AIM to WotaWaster Send a message via MSN to WotaWaster Send a message via Yahoo to WotaWaster
Default

You should have an optimal amount that you would like to raise with each hand depending upon position and game conditions and then very that only slightly in order to mix up your play.

E.g I prefer to raise 4bb with Ak but 7bb with AA/KK for fairly obvious reasons. If you play with someone frequently then you should probably stick to your optimum conditions 75% of the time and the other 25% (or less) make a larger/smaller raise than usual or flat call.

If you always raise to 3bb with aces then you are giving enormous implied odds for small-medium pairs to hit trips on you and take your entire stack.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2006, 03:07 PM
the alex's Avatar
PokerForums God
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nort Side o' Shi-kawgo
Posts: 7,961
Trade Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to the alex Send a message via MSN to the alex Send a message via Yahoo to the alex
Default

I've been varying my raises for a long time, but that's from being a cash gamer and my raise size is completely independent of my hand. I can have any 2 cards. The size of my raise is dependent on the limpers in front, the amount of limpers in front, how many are to act, who's to act, and how short my stack is at the time (my Q).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FaDi View Post
GodFadiR (12:32:45 AM): but lets be honest
GodFadiR (12:32:48 AM): who doesnt wanna fuck me
WotaWotaWota (12:33:22 AM): I do
WotaWotaWota (12:33:27 AM): in tehanus
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2006, 03:10 PM
Mr.McJ's Avatar
Stu Ungar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 2,404
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WotaWaster
If you always raise to 3bb with aces then you are giving enormous implied odds for small-medium pairs to hit trips on you and take your entire stack.
I don't agree with Gordon on the 3bb either so let's adjust his argument slightly.

You should always raise the same amount, xbb. By that I mean
Tight table, always raise 3bb.
Loose table, always raise 5bb.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2006, 03:10 PM
Mr.McJ's Avatar
Stu Ungar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 2,404
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

For the record, I agree that you should vary your raise and do the same myself. I just wondered if anyone agreed with Gordon's method and if so, why?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2006, 03:15 PM
the alex's Avatar
PokerForums God
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nort Side o' Shi-kawgo
Posts: 7,961
Trade Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to the alex Send a message via MSN to the alex Send a message via Yahoo to the alex
Default

I don't do it based on the table because your position changes on different people every hand. It's hand by hand for me in the early to mid stages of an MTT. Last 5 tables, I stay between 2.5-3.5bbs because I play a lot of small pots instead of sitting back for big cards to play big pots.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by FaDi View Post
GodFadiR (12:32:45 AM): but lets be honest
GodFadiR (12:32:48 AM): who doesnt wanna fuck me
WotaWotaWota (12:33:22 AM): I do
WotaWotaWota (12:33:27 AM): in tehanus
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2006, 03:18 PM
OrionPro's Avatar
Stu Ungar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,672
Trade Rating: (0)
Limits Played: $1-$2 NL
Default

Somewhere in Gordons book he writes that he uses lower raises from early positions and raises more from later position. I do that sometimes but cannot really say it has improved my game. The problem is that those 2xBB raises are too easily called, and the 4xBB raise spoils trouble when you steal with garbage (more invested than necessary to get the job done). The other problem is that people may associate 2xBB with a weak hand, which is a problem if your hand really is weak (KJo etc).

Later in tourneys I like to do standard raises (3xBB) to not give away any information (no implied odds for small pairs anyways)
__________________
ICM / EV Calculator and other free poker software

Last edited by OrionPro; 07-21-2006 at 03:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2006, 04:33 PM
tom.hunter's Avatar
Check Raiser
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 680
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

the 3bb thing sounds far too rigid...so you may gain in keeping people from figuring your out slightly but surly with a hand like qq kk you wanna raise more than say AA to get 1 caller as your scared of overcards on the flop...thats just an example but you'll misout on tons of important pre-flop advantages to varying your raise to an amount that helps your position in the hand
__________________
Wealthymarketer, the latest and greatest way to earn online.
wealthymarketer
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2006, 04:42 PM
xxdemexx's Avatar
Poker Professional
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,815
Trade Rating: (0)
Default 6 max.

My raises are all over the place.. tends to average 4+ (what I feel will do the job) bb in late. In early 4bb + position is enough to fire off overwhelming hands I find. On average I puty much more money in laste than early...

I'm opposed to any static approach to poker. If I've been banging away at the blinds with 4bb+ for a few orbits - I may, as first in on the button just minimum raise - from an aggressive player his can be quite disturbing...and assures the table that my 4bb "means" something-- lol..

This is about how you "couple" with the table...If the table has been minimum raising for a few orbits then you can easily take out three limpers preflop with 5bb. If there's a maniac out there left to play 5bb will tend to stir him up - this can be good or bad...

I often play off stacks. If theres a short stack there I will tune my bet into getting him pot committed and hopefully bounce up the pot through him..
__________________
See me playing $10/$20NL like it was play money

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...405&q=xxdemexx

Doberman: "but Sarge, isn't poker gambling and just luck?"
Sgt. Bilko:" not the way I play it"
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2006, 05:02 PM
PokerForums God
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,172
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

I think Gordon overestimates how quickly people will get reads on your raises in big tournaments.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:01 AM.

   Designed by
      
No Deposit Bonus
Poker Strategy
Poker Rooms
PartyPoker Bonus Codes
Poker Site USA
Online Casino Bonuses
Pokerspiele
Casinos That Accept USA Players
Poker Rakeback
Full Tilt bonus code
Rakeback
Casino
Nowadays in the Internet the Players are looking for a good Casino Bonus to find the best possible options for online Roulette.There is now the option of RtlPoker and a nice Casino Bonus to play some other games then just Poker.
The ideal casino site for gokkasten and even online poker including online casino games that can be found on mijn online casino, your casino information site for when gambling online or even offline.
Party Poker bonus code & room review
Tony G talks about his experinces in his blog
REVIEW OF PARADISE POKER WEBSITE
Online Poker Room Directory and latest poker news
Best Online Poker info on Internet!
Ultimate Bet new 40% deposit bonus
Copyright © 2004-2008 PokerForums.org, a Merendi Networks Inc. project.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.