I wont even get near full ring (9 or 10 max) enless its for a game like OH where the site doesnt have 6 MAX, like pstars.

If there are 6 max tables, im on them

I have a question for you guys, when its 9-handed and the first 3 players fold to you. Do you consider this the same as playing a 6-handed table? Or do you play looser or tighter then you would 6-handed.

Im just thinking about this because if the first 3 players fold that would have to increase the odds that the last 5 players will have a high PP. Or am I totally out to lunch here?

Didn't we just have this thread? Also, missing the blatant sex joke in the title... what have we become?

Originally Posted by Auto

I have a question for you guys, when its 9-handed and the first 3 players fold to you. Do you consider this the same as playing a 6-handed table? Or do you play looser or tighter then you would 6-handed.

Im just thinking about this because if the first 3 players fold that would have to increase the odds that the last 5 players will have a high PP. Or am I totally out to lunch here?

No, IMO you still think of it as 9 player table.

9 Players were delt cards. 9 possibilies of having a better hand then you.

Just because 2 players folded, it doesnt change how many were dealt in

I persoanly have made more money in shorthanded (limit) games,
but they require higher bankroll and more skills.

I would go to a full table if you don't have much experience (at least couple years of pokre)

Nima

i hardly play cash, but when i do
i prefer the 9/10 person ring game if its nl.
1) 3 more hands to see for free
2) sit back and only play premium hands
3) be aggressive when you hit the nuts, with 9/10 people, someone will surely look you up
4) i feel that there is too much aggression at the 6 person table, especially a lot of aggressive bluffers. if i don't have a good hand, i find its hard to call them down (even when i feel i'm ahead).
5) i feel like i'm getting blinded to death at the 6 also.