I always though tha good players would always get more bad beats against than for them, simply because they have better starting hand requirements and a better knowledge of odds etc. Therefore good players always have their money in when they're favourite or close to it.
That would mean that everytime you are outdrawn as a good player, it is probably deemed a bad beat, because you were good enough to be ahead when the money goes in.
Isn't that the reason we aren't results oriented when analysing hands?
__________________
If I enjoy necrophilia and beastiality, am I flogging a dead horse?
|
Linear Mode
