Two hands where I get people all in, but the pussies have nothing on the damn table.

Hand #1
I had at least 200 hands on everyone here in my database.

I hate minimum raises, but "UTG+1" in this hand was an UBERtight player and a limp from a guy like this smelled like 99-QQ where he'd call, but I knew, I absolutely KNEW he'd limp/raise with Aces or Kings, so I went with the min. When he called, I knew an Ace or a King were good and any of these guys with a pair would've raised or folded. Raise to see how good their pair was or fold because they think I'm trying to induce a big re-raise with a weak raise.

In other words, kids, don't try this at home.

Ultimate Bet No-Limit Hold'em, $4 BB (10 handed) converter

MP3 ($392)
CO ($489.50)
Button ($155)
SB ($189)
BB ($505.10)
UTG ($427.60)
UTG+1 ($272.10)
UTG+2 ($587.15)
MP1 ($1037.50)
Hero ($628.20)

Preflop: Hero is MP2 with , .
1 fold, UTG+1 calls $4, 2 folds, Hero raises to $8, 2 folds, Button calls $8, 1 fold, BB calls $4, UTG+1 calls $4.

Flop: ($34) , , (4 players)
BB checks, UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $10, Button calls $10, BB folds, UTG+1 folds.

Turn: ($54) (2 players)
Hero checks, Button bets $54, Hero raises to $137, Button calls $87 and is all-in

River: ($328) (2 players)

Final Pot: $328

Results:
Hero has Kc As (three of a kind, kings).
Button doesn't show.
Outcome: Hero wins $328.

Whatever, could've take more off of Nemo, but would've probably fucked myself if the K hi flop were accompanied by a Queen, but put some damn moolah on the table.

Hand #2
This PF call was out of frustration from:
A.) small stacks running me out of pots with big raises and
B.) the SB was a maniac and maniac in the blind LOVE to make big re-raises to minimum raises.

I was thinking he had AJ, or AQ at best especially when he checked the flop. When he checked the flop, I knew he was calling anything, but wanted to unzip and show the real deal when he least expected it. Stupid, yes. I was on tilt.

This was the same table as the first hand here and this is "UTG" in Hand #1. Look at his stack in Hand #1 and look at the beginning of Hand #2. He lost over $1,500 in this game tonight, to inform the "masses," by the way.

Ultimate Bet No-Limit Hold'em, $4 BB (7 handed) converter

MP2 ($99)
CO ($150.50)
Button ($156)
SB ($106.60)
BB ($209.20)
Hero ($1148.30)
MP1 ($199.20)

Preflop: Hero is UTG with , .
Hero calls $4, 2 folds, CO raises to $8, 1 fold, SB raises to $32, 1 fold, Hero calls $28, CO folds.

Flop: ($76) , , (2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks.

Turn: ($76) (2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks.

River: ($76) (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $76, SB calls $74.60 (All-In).

Final Pot: $226.60

Results:
SB has Jc Jh (one pair, jacks).
Hero has 7c 7s (three of a kind, sevens).
Outcome: Hero wins $226.60.

I was talking shit to this guy all session. Oops. I sucked him out. Tonight felt great, but I would've loved to have won more on these two sets in my NL comeback after this 45+ day NL hiatus. It was a good night, though, so I can't complain.

THE ALEX IS BACK IN FULL AFFECT!!!

I'm still a gonna stick closer to limit for a while though, so don't get too carried away, Alex and friends.

__________________

Another note: CO in Hand #2 is a total puss. He'd good with big pairs when it comes to raising big, but tells the strength of his hand PF with the size of his raise, so I understand SB's re-raise with his Jacks.

He actually played this well, but i won't give him the credit of "knowing" his Jacks were good. He thought, "Oh Boy! I have Jacks!" because if he had KToff, he would've thought, "Oh boy! There's $18 in the pot to steal!"

__________________