did i play this hand wrong on the turn?
should i have 3-bet instead of cold call the raise?
Ultimate Bet 2/4 Hold'em (7 handed) converter
Preflop: Hero is CO with,
.
UTG calls, 2 folds, Hero raises, 2 folds, BB calls, UTG calls.
Flop: (6.50 SB),
,
(3 players)
BB checks, UTG checks, Hero bets, BB calls, UTG calls.
Turn: (4.75 BB)(3 players)
BB checks, UTG checks, Hero bets, BB folds, UTG raises, Hero calls.
River: (8.75 BB)(2 players)
UTG bets, Hero folds.
Final Pot: 9.75 BB
Results in white below:
UTG doesn't show.
Outcome: UTG wins 9.75 BB.
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread: AQos in MP
-
02-21-2006 #1
AQos in MP
-
02-21-2006 #2
This different than the A-JavaScript hand you posted in that with this hand you were check-raised and the probability of a made flush goes up to 99% IMO. You had to see the river in case you hit your full house but folding was pretty much a given once the 4th spade virtually garanteed the flush. Tuf run of cards you're having.
Originally Posted by Eclipse86

-
02-21-2006 #3
I check the turn looking to call down with 2 pair. If he made the flush then so be it, but you cost yourself an additional bet and then didnt even see the showdown. The 4th spade almost assures he made the flush, but if he bluffed you off you will never know.
Is the villian playing Kxs (KQs specifically?)? Perhaps he was playing KsQd and was raising the turn for flush value? I doubt he was scared of the A when it showed since you bet the Q.
Before you bet on a bad card think about what you would prefer have happen. Do you want to see a showdown or do you want to bluff off an opponenet? The villian here had no intention of folding the hand so I think you would have been better off playing toward a showdown. The 4th spade probably would have saved you a bet and if you filled up on the river you would have capped there.Trons: "...be a winning person first."
RECENT SUCCESS: December
4th place $20+2 Stars MTT $1740, 3rd place $15+1.50 Stars MTT $1300
-
02-21-2006 #4
With two callers, a flush draw is very likely; however, when both check, you still need to bet. If you're sureh he has the flush, calling 4th is probably a mistake unless he will lead AND call a raise with an A/Q river. Most players won't, they'll either value bet-fold or check/call. On the river it comes down to if he will bluff more than 9.4% of the time here. I don't think he can, I fold.
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
02-21-2006 #5
Originally Posted by The Real DeCoy
But how would i have known that the villian there had no intention of folding the hand?? he check-called me on the flop.. then checked it to me again on the turn right? i was last to act right, so are u saying that i should have checked behind both players on the turn? then see what happens on the river?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
,
,
,
(3 players)
(2 players)
Reply With Quote