PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t50 (7 handed)
converter
MP1 (t380)
MP2 (t1745)
CO (t1375)
Hero (t3965)
SB (t1645)
BB (t2560)
UTG (t3330)
Preflop: Hero is Button with

,

.
4 folds,
Hero raises to t150,
1 fold, BB calls t100.
I felt a 3bb raise would be enough to push them off their crap hands and anybody who stayed may have a decent hand...I'd only raised on other hand where I ended up AI against 2 other people...I had KK on that one too and won...
Flop: (t325)

,

,
(2 players)
BB checks,
Hero bets t300, BB calls t300.
the A bothered me on the flop seeings as it is likely that BB would have stayed with Ax. I figured about a pot sized bet would take away odds on the FD (BB had been playing fairly solid) and a call would probably convince me I'm beat...
Turn: (t925)
(2 players)
BB checks, Hero checks.
Didn't see any reason to bet this. I feel I'm beat by the A on the flop.
River: (t925)
(2 players)
BB bets t150, Hero calls t150.
I felt I had a little over 6:1 odds...I felt there was a chance he could have called down with something goofy and those odds were enough to see...
Final Pot: t1225
Results in white below:
Hero has Ks Kh (one pair, kings).
BB has Kc Ah (one pair, aces).
Outcome: BB wins t1225.
Ok...I'm sure the first comments are going to be raise more PF...I'd watched the SB and the BB closely to see what kind of bets they were folding to PF (not knowing their cards) and both were playing fairly tight. They both had reason to respect a raise by me and I figured I could play this a little slower...
My main question is...even though I had a read on BB should I have called that river bet based on the 6:1 odds alone, or should I have trusted my read and folded...thereby possibly enhancing the idea I may have been on a steal.