
02-02-2006, 11:04 AM
|
 |
Stu Ungar
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 2,404
|
|
Did I do anything wrong here?
Or did I just get unlucky?
Quote:
Texas Hold'em $0.25-$0.25 NL (real money), hand #75,852,828
Table Sarajewo, 2 Feb 2006 03:01 PM
View Previous hand for this table.
Seat 2: HARVARD-YARD ($19.50 in chips)
Seat 3: MrMcj [6C,6H] ($44.70 in chips)
Seat 4: BucGator ($25.80 in chips)
Seat 5: a700727 ($8.25 in chips)
Seat 6: filbert99 ($20.25 in chips)
Seat 7: tm-79 ($12 in chips)
Seat 8: DoofusGoofus ($23.20 in chips)
Seat 9: fishsak ($21.75 in chips)
Seat 10: reporp1 ($24.25 in chips)
ANTES/BLINDS
fishsak posts blind ($0.15), reporp1 posts blind ($0.25), tm-79 posts blind ($0.25).
PRE-FLOP
HARVARD-YARD calls $0.25, MrMcj calls $0.25, BucGator calls $0.25, a700727 calls $0.25, filbert99 folds, tm-79 checks, DoofusGoofus calls $0.25, fishsak calls $0.10, reporp1 checks.
FLOP [board cards 6D,2C,2D ]
fishsak checks, reporp1 checks, HARVARD-YARD checks, MrMcj checks, BucGator checks, a700727 checks, tm-79 checks, DoofusGoofus checks.
TURN [board cards 6D,2C,2D,2H ]
fishsak bets $3, reporp1 folds, HARVARD-YARD folds, MrMcj bets $6, BucGator folds, a700727 folds, tm-79 calls $6, DoofusGoofus folds, fishsak calls $3.
RIVER [board cards 6D,2C,2D,2H,8D ]
fishsak checks, MrMcj bets $5, tm-79 calls $5, fishsak folds.
SHOWDOWN
MrMcj shows [ 6C,6H ]
tm-79 shows [ 2S,JC ]
tm-79 wins $29.50.
SUMMARY
Dealer: DoofusGoofus
Pot: $30, (including rake: $0.50)
HARVARD-YARD, loses $0.25
MrMcj, loses $11.25
BucGator, loses $0.25
a700727, loses $0.25
filbert99, loses $0
tm-79, bets $11.25, collects $29.50, net $18.25
DoofusGoofus, loses $0.25
fishsak, loses $6.25
reporp1, loses $0.25
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|

02-02-2006, 11:12 AM
|
|
PokerForums God
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,172
|
|
don't fear the quads. although there was a flush draw and you could have sweetenend the pot a little on the flop.
|

02-02-2006, 11:17 AM
|
 |
Poker Professional
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,732
|
|
It wouldn't have helped you, but I would have bet the flop - I don't like slowplaying with a flush draw on the board.
How the the WORLD does tm-79 not raise you on the river? Count yourself lucky you didn't lose your stack.
__________________
I'm CDO. It's like OCD, but everying is in order just like it should be.
|

02-02-2006, 11:19 AM
|
 |
Stu Ungar
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 2,404
|
|
I was kind of suspicous when he called my $6 bet on the turn as I didn't really put him on an overpair.
Side note: 10 hands later I had pocket 6s and flopped a set. That hand went a lot better. 
|

02-02-2006, 11:20 AM
|
 |
Stu Ungar
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 2,404
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Girevik
It wouldn't have helped you, but I would have bet the flop - I don't like slowplaying with a flush draw on the board.
How the the WORLD does tm-79 not raise you on the river? Count yourself lucky you didn't lose your stack.
|
I was thinking the same thing. I'm definitely not good enough to make that kind of laydown. But why would I bet the flop? I had a full house so I wasn't worried about the flush.
|

02-02-2006, 11:21 AM
|
 |
Poker Professional
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,732
|
|
Sorry - you're right. Misread the hand. Though the turn and river brought the 2's and you just had the set on the flop.
__________________
I'm CDO. It's like OCD, but everying is in order just like it should be.
|

02-02-2006, 12:03 PM
|
|
PokerForums God
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,172
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr.McJ
I was thinking the same thing. I'm definitely not good enough to make that kind of laydown. But why would I bet the flop? I had a full house so I wasn't worried about the flush.
|
tm had to be almost all in anyway, like only 75c left or so.
the reason I would bet the flop is that you are liable to get money from the flush draws and any other pocket pair as well as some over cards. May as well start building a pot.
|

02-02-2006, 12:14 PM
|
 |
Stu Ungar
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 2,404
|
|
Of course. Makes sense.
|

02-02-2006, 01:37 PM
|
 |
Stu Ungar
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Montréal
Posts: 2,398
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mr.McJ
I was thinking the same thing. I'm definitely not good enough to make that kind of laydown. But why would I bet the flop? I had a full house so I wasn't worried about the flush.
|
BTW... nobidy is good neough to fold that hand... Maybe Phill Hellmuth would have fold the flop cuz he would have been afraise of the ducks, but its another story.
To answer your question qhy bet the flop?:
Take money from the FD Over pair and even over cards...
But, the main reason is to fake a good hand and hide the monster. Nobody will put you on a FH when you play the streets if you bet that flop... 95% of the players check the monster on the flop online.
KJ
__________________
Originally Posted by Girevik
Heck, I've seen people go nuts with middle pair!
|

02-03-2006, 08:38 AM
|
|
Fish
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 96
|
|
I wouldnt worry about the 2 though, thats one of those hands that are set up and you will lose money by playing correctly... all you can do is go for a read (which Im guessing yuo didnt have, as he seems to be paying the blinds before the hands are dealt so i guess he just joined), or play with small stacks. But that just means when its your turn to be set up like that you wont win as much.
Id bet so much on the river though if I were him. Flush draw came up, he puts you on a full house so he should know a big bet would show you he was drawing dead and made the hand..
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:43 PM.
|
 |