Home
News
Articles
Site Reviews
Book Reviews
Interviews
Chat
Tournaments
60% Rakeback
50% RakebackNew!
125% Rakeback
Probabilities
Glossary
Poker Gear
Links
Advertise
User Name  
 
Password
Cookie?  
 
 
Poker Players on Launchpoker.com
LaunchPoker.com provides you with all the information you need about this year's WSOP event, from the 2008 WSOP schedule to the latest 2008 WSOP updates.
Online poker reviews of rooms such as Full Tilt Poker, Poker Stars and Titan Poker.
Extras

RakeBack
PokerListings

  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2006, 02:32 PM
Trons's Avatar
Poker Hustler
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,195
Trade Rating: (0)
Default Another one for comments.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t30 (8 handed) converter

CO (t1420)
Button (t1670)
SB (t1765)
Hero (t1415)
UTG (t3050)
UTG+1 (t1000)
MP1 (t1805)
MP2 (t1375)

Preflop: Hero is BB with , .
UTG calls t30, 3 folds, CO calls t30, 2 folds, Hero checks.

No brainer here...BB can be so nice sometimes

Flop: (t105) , , (3 players)
Hero checks, UTG bets t60, CO calls t60, Hero calls t60.

Ok...I'd only played one hand out side of the the blinds at this table. UTG had played several. Since he limped from UTG I had him on 2 unconnected painted, AT+ or possibly low suited connected. Anything better and he's been raising. I didn't have a read on CO. I thought about betting this flop, but I wanted a better feal for UTG. If he bet, then I could safely put him on something like KJ or Q9. Since the flop seemed reasonably safe (I felt he would have raised had he had KQ, I was certain I was way ahead).

Turn: (t285) (3 players)
Hero checks, UTG bets t120, CO calls t120, Hero calls t120.

Ten scared me alittle since QT was a very possible holding. Because of his agression prior to this hand, I wanted to see how much he bet before I decided what to do. I felt his hand was low so I still kept him on TPG-MK or MPMK. I seriously thought about the check raise at this point...and probably should have to define my hand...board was getting a little scary...I decided since this was my first serious hand in the game, I could afford to get a little tricky...

River: (t645) (3 players)
Hero checks, UTG bets t120, CO folds, Hero raises to t510, UTG calls t390.

I went for the check raise...I wanted just less then a pot sized bet to make it look like I was bluffing the flush...I knew he wouldn't call an all in and wanted to extract as many chips as possible without pushing him to fold...

Final Pot: t1665

Results in white below:
Hero has Qd 7c (two pair, queens and sevens).
UTG has Js Kh (one pair, kings).
Outcome: Hero wins t1665.


I look back at this one and I'm completely forgetting that CO was in the hand. While I kept it in mind when he would call, I was so focused on my read on UTG that I kind of got into tunnel vision. I was fairly glad when CO folded on the river...I didn't have a read on him and had no idea what he could have been calling with...how bad did I screw this up?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason75
I like trons' advice.
Trons
JstTrons
Toyotatruck
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2006, 02:49 PM
bonchkid's Avatar
change my title babo
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 6,758
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

Flop, check raise is ok since no one has AKish. If it was raised, I'd prefer to lead into the raiser here. Not that many draws(soem straights, but they should be obvious) so checkraise can't backfire too bad.

Turn: Th is an icky card, it puts out many flush and straight draws. I'd bet 250 and see what happens. If you must check raise here, do it.

River: Ick, the flush draw came in and he still led into 2 callers. He's gotta have a decent hand to be value betting here. Is this river checkraise a bluff? You really think you're good here that often? I hate every street
__________________
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2006, 03:39 PM
PokerForums God
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,172
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

I overbet the pot on the flop. probably a checkraise.. I dont like messing around with bottom two pair.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2006, 04:07 PM
KINGJACK's Avatar
Stu Ungar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Montréal
Posts: 2,398
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

I check raise the flop too...

KJ
__________________
Originally Posted by Girevik
Heck, I've seen people go nuts with middle pair!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2006, 09:30 PM
Dizzy_Fuzz's Avatar
Check Raiser
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 764
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

I checkraise the flop and just call the bet on the river, the reraise is fine if you really think your ahead but on a board like that with him betting out it might be hard to beleive you are.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2006, 10:11 PM
Marm's Avatar
PokerForums God
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 9,296
Trade Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Marm Send a message via MSN to Marm
Default

I don't see anything wrong with the way you played it, or the replies by everybody else. This is one of those hands that you can't play it TOO bad. If you bet out, you may lose them, but if you slowplay, you may give the freecard that kills ya. You can only do what you want, as long as you know why you are doing each thing, and hope for the best.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2006, 10:17 PM
Jack King off's Avatar
Poker Hustler
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: nyc
Posts: 828
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

i dont like the check/raise on the river. the board is a little scary. they may not bet without having a bigger hand next time. i think the time to check/raise was the turn. the flop call is ok, if you are going to c/r on the turn.
__________________
it's better to be pissed off than pissed on
missot on stars. come to my poker vent server! (its a voice chat program)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-02-2006, 04:24 AM
Check Raiser
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 724
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

I just don't believe that bottom two pair is a strong enough hand to slowplay. I think you're sacrificing a TON of equity by failing to protect your hand with a raise on the flop and again on the turn.

AK of hearts on the turn, for example has 4 J, 3 T, 3 A and 2 K and 8 hearts are all full outs (his hand, KJ, was the same). That's way too many outs for you to be blithely checking behind. Probably the worst part is that after he got a chance to see all his cards and potentially draw out on you, you went ahead and raised.
__________________
-You may not know this, but poker is a game of incomplete information.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:59 PM.

   Designed by
      
No Deposit Bonus
Poker Strategy
Poker Rooms
PartyPoker Bonus Codes
Online Poker Strategy
Online Casino Bonuses
Pokerspiele
Casinos That Accept USA Players
Poker Rakeback
Full Tilt bonus code
Rakeback
Poker Site USA
Nowadays in the Internet the Players are looking for a good Casino Bonus to find the best possible options for online Roulette.There is now the option of RtlPoker and a nice Casino Bonus to play some other games then just Poker.
The ideal casino site for gokkasten and even online poker including online casino games that can be found on mijn online casino, your casino information site for when gambling online or even offline.
Party Poker bonus code & room review
Tony G talks about his experinces in his blog
REVIEW OF PARADISE POKER WEBSITE
Online Poker Room Directory and latest poker news
Best Online Poker info on Internet!
Ultimate Bet new 40% deposit bonus
Copyright © 2004-2008 PokerForums.org, a Merendi Networks Inc. project.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.