PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t200 (8 handed) converter
BB (t4710)
UTG (t1085)
UTG+1 (t730)
MP1 (t3595)
MP2 (t2055)
Hero (t750)
Button (t680)
SB (t1395)
Preflop: Hero is CO with,
.
1 fold, UTG+1 raises to t730, MP1 calls t730, 1 fold, Hero raises to t750, 3 folds, MP1 calls t20.
Here is my reasoning. my M is low...I have a decent hand, I didn't expect MP1 to have much because the size of his stack and what he had to call to knock the other guy out and I figured I wouldn't get a better hand...WITH better odds on my money before I was blinded out...was this the right time to make this call?
Flop: (t2530),
,
(3 players)
Turn: (t2530)(3 players)
River: (t2530)(3 players)
Final Pot: t2530
Results in white below:
UTG+1 has Th Ks (straight, jack high).
MP1 has 3s As (high card, ace).
Hero has Qh Td (straight, queen high).
Outcome: Hero wins t2530.
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
-
01-31-2006 #1
Did I have the odds to pull this move?
Trons
Originally Posted by Jason75
JstTrons
Toyotatruck

-
01-31-2006 #2
Insta fold for me... Somebodies got you beat here......
Marm is back, maybe. Been off for 3 years. Rusty as Hell.
Luck is a Residue of Design.
-
01-31-2006 #3
Well lets see, UTG's range is huge(almost any two). We're not really scared of him; however, if MP1 is halfway decent he must have a hand here with all the players behind him. He's gotta have 77+, AQ+ KQ maybe
foldzor“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
01-31-2006 #4
Using Bonchs hand range there, we get with pokerstove:
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 24.8408 % 24.10% 00.74% { QhTd }
Hand 2: 28.2952 % 26.72% 01.58% { 22+, A2s+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, A2o+, KTo+, QTo+, JTo }
Hand 3: 46.8641 % 45.68% 01.19% { 77+, AJs+, KQs, AJo+ }
looks like you needed 3-1 odds, and you were getting about 2-1Marm is back, maybe. Been off for 3 years. Rusty as Hell.
Luck is a Residue of Design.
-
01-31-2006 #5
Ok, here was my thinking. I didn't put MP1 on that wide of a range of hands. Everybody behind him had been playing super tight. I figured if he had any type of decent hand, including the range that bonch mentioned, he would have raised to get get people out. When he called, (which I expected at least a call from him) instead of reraising, I discounted a serious hand...
I figured I was up against 2 almost completely random hands and getting 2:1 on a hand I probably would have pushed with had it been folded to me, I figured I couldn't pass up those odds...
This was my thinking when I was trying to decide what to do...is this not a correct thought process?Trons
Originally Posted by Jason75
JstTrons
Toyotatruck

-
01-31-2006 #6PokerForums God
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 8,204
dont have too much to add to this.
Originally Posted by Marm
You have a hand that is dominated, i would rather have 76s than QTo in this spot. Plus you are in late position and can hopefully get a chance to be first in the pot.
I think I would need at least AQs to call here though.
-
01-31-2006 #7
Ok, I think we can determine that while it payed off, it was a bad move. BTW, I ended up winning this one...this was my second STT win for the day so I was pretty happy about it.
Thanks again for all the comments.Trons
Originally Posted by Jason75
JstTrons
Toyotatruck

-
01-31-2006 #8Check Raiser
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 724
I don't like to call all-in in those situations... I want to be the one attacking.
I simply don't call with marginal hands. I either bet or fold... if someone beats me to raising, oh well. Hands like QTo come along pretty frequently... you'll get another shot
-You may not know this, but poker is a game of incomplete information.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
,
.
,
,
(3 players)
(3 players)
(3 players)
Reply With Quote

