PokerStars Game #3299362701: Tournament #16337233, Hold'em No Limit - Level III (25/50) - 2005/12/10 - 22:27:00 (ET)
Table '16337233 1' Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: 07shooter (2315 in chips)
Seat 2: Phil_STG (2775 in chips)
Seat 3: t33hpokery (775 in chips)
Seat 4: hickoryhill (1445 in chips)
Seat 6: richNYC (3395 in chips)
Seat 8: bovis18 (1570 in chips)
Seat 9: rocket711 (1225 in chips)
richNYC: posts small blind 25
bovis18: posts big blind 50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to t33hpokery [Td Th]
rocket711: folds
07shooter: calls 50
Phil_STG: folds
t33hpokery: raises 725 to 775 and is all-in
anyone likey?
I've been SUPER card dead, I haven't seen a flop outside the blinds all tourney. Lost a bit earlier when I had to fold 2 pair on the turn.
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 1 to 10 of 12
Thread: $55 SnG hand
-
12-10-2005 #1
$55 SnG hand
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
12-10-2005 #2
eh...could be worse. the problem is, you're only taking 125 chips if they fold, and if you get called you're probably beat. at the same time, you are shortstacked, so maybe not... you might get a call by 88,99, which is ideal, or if you're willing to race, then AK,AQ doesnt look bad either
-
12-10-2005 #3
I'd have to agree. Tough spot to be in with your stack in relation to the blinds. If you raise you put most of your stack out there and when K-Q-7 flops, you're not exactly feeling really great about your hand. Even if you only collect the blinds, it still sets you up to make your next move.
-
12-10-2005 #4PokerForums God
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 8,204
I do it all the time.
-
12-10-2005 #5
If you're only after what's in the pot at the time, wouldn't a 200-250 bet accomplish the same thing? Even if you're called and decide to fold on the flop you still have 500+/- for another chance. Given a good flop, you can still go all-in.
I'm not suggesting all-in pf is wrong - just that there are alternatives and that they should be used from time to time. This alternative has an exit strategy whereas all-in doesn't.

-
12-10-2005 #6
I think you have to push with your stack. Rought spot to be in picking up no cards and then gettin 1010. I would have done the exact same thing though. You were probably ahead or atleast in a coinflip situation.
-
12-11-2005 #7
Just checking. I don't like being in the situation where there is 500+ in the pot, and 500 in my stack. It's too tough to fold on 1 overcard flops still. I'd rather get the money in now.
I figured I might get some loose calls since I'm a pretty short stack. Say 77+ AK,AQ. I'm actually a slight favorite against that range.“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
12-11-2005 #8
Lots of ways to play that, but the push looks good to me.
-
12-11-2005 #9
Well, if that was your intent (getting someone to call) in the first place, I don't understand your reluctance. The alternative I suggested was for a guy I figured was reluctant to go all-in with T-T but if it was you're intention to get called, you got what you wanted - that's got to make you happy! Or did you lose?
Originally Posted by bonchkid

-
12-11-2005 #10
bonch asked me to post results of the hand... everyone folded and he took down the pot
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

