LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksPokerStars 1/2 Hold'em (6 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx
A super lag is in the BB, the rest of the table is fairly weak tight but this guy was 77/56/5.6, and never really stopped bluffing. I raised PF to isolate him with a good hand, I would have raised even with a bunch of limpers in front of me.
Preflop: Hero is CO with,
.
2 folds, Hero raises, 2 folds, BB calls.
Flop: (4.50 SB),
,
(2 players)
BB bets, Hero raises, BB calls.
Turn: (4.25 BB)(2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets, BB raises, Hero calls.
River: (8.25 BB)(2 players)
BB bets, Hero raises, BB 3-bets, Hero caps, BB calls.
Final Pot: 16.25 BB
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thread: Playing against a super LAG
-
12-07-2005 #1Poker Hustler
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 1,161
Playing against a super LAG?
Last edited by Phytopath; 12-07-2005 at 06:46 PM.
-
12-07-2005 #2Poker Professional
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 1,670
shouldnt this be in glory corner? where is the strategy question?
-
12-07-2005 #3Poker Hustler
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 1,161
Originally Posted by bboy
err, I meant to ask did I go overboard here on the river?
-
12-07-2005 #4Poker Hustler
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Location
- Postville, Iowa
- Posts
- 817
no you didn't. jam that shit. if he's got KQ...
-
12-07-2005 #5Poker Professional
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 1,670
based on his preflop, flop, and turn play, i'd say there is nearly 0 chance he has KQ.
jam that shit
-
12-07-2005 #6Check Raiser
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Las Vegas
- Posts
- 706
Villian has AQ? I agree that KQ is NOT a reasonable possibility. Ya gotta think he has a Q in his hand to be willing to cap the river with four to the straight, and his turn checkraise means he must have had some sort of made hand. AQ is the logical choice, I think, but since it is SO hard to believe he has KQ then yeah you cap even though it might be a split pot.
Originally Posted by Beavis68
Originally Posted by backdoor
-
12-08-2005 #7Check Raiser
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 724
I don't know... I think the absolute best you could hope for if he's raising here is the split pot. I don't think he's raising pocket 5's here. I don't think you can win money from him here... at best your splitting it, though KQ is highly unlikely, why risk another bet if it can't possibly win you one?
-You may not know this, but poker is a game of incomplete information.
-
12-08-2005 #8Check Raiser
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Las Vegas
- Posts
- 706
Because often you will run into a moron that flips over two pair. I think that "chance of moron with two pair" >>>> "chance of moron with KQ" so cap! The rake structure online isn't enough to make it a consideration,, IMO. Originally Posted by PJ of TheGame
Originally Posted by Beavis68
Originally Posted by backdoor
-
12-08-2005 #9PokerForums God
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- Nort Side o' Shi-kawgo
- Posts
- 7,959
Even super LAG's back off when someone's aggressive with an Ace on board unless they at least have an Ace. The check-raise on the turn from BB tells you that you should feel good about your hand. At best, Villian has QT. He'd be more aggressive PF with AA, AK, AQ, AJ, JJ, and probably KQ.
I like the way you played this hand. Hands like these are why wreckless players are producers. Nice hand. Originally Posted by FaDi
-
12-08-2005 #10Poker Professional
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 1,670
against a superLAG i give him MAYBE 50% having a queen in his hand.
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
