Welcome to PokerForums.org

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 41
  1. #1
    Chaser
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    136

    Default The difference between ring and tournament games?

    I basically lose all my money in ring games, but I do well in low buy-in SnG/large tourny.

    Why?

  2. #2
    PokerForums God Marm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cleveland
    Posts
    9,757

    Default

    Well first do a search on your topic... we have had numerous discussions on this, but in short, the nature of Cash is exploiting as much EV Now as possible, but tournaments you can sacrifice small amounts of EV now for larger EV gains in the future....
    Marm is back, maybe. Been off for 3 years. Rusty as Hell.

    Luck is a Residue of Design.

  3. #3
    Poker Professional
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,670

    Default

    escalating blinds make play easier

  4. #4
    PokerForums God
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    8,204

    Default

    try short buying into a cash game.

  5. #5
    The Forefather KiD[ReD]'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    BC, Canada
    Posts
    4,430

    Default

    I'm exactly like this too. I think it has something to do with being able to take advantage of stack size and survival better, as well as tilt being less of a factor (since tilt doesn't seem to affect tourney/sng play nearly as much as in ring)
    KiD[ReD]
    Ex-Owner/Administrator
    Merendi Networks Inc. (Merendi.com)

  6. #6
    Check Raiser
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    639

    Default

    Mainly because if somehting puts you on tilt it probaly has already knocked you out of the tournament so your not going to lose more, atleast thats my theory

  7. #7
    Banned Irexes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Essex, UK
    Posts
    2,389

    Default

    I think you can be successful in a tourney with a ring strategy, but if you play ring with a tourney strategy you're going to lose big style

  8. #8
    (Formerly Steve-O) Steve Ruddock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    5,966

    Default

    tourneys are geared toward calculated risk takers, cash games favor a disciplined player
    Read my musings on poker and life at Online Poker Examiner, Poker Examiner, PokerNewsBoy.com, and My Poker Blog

  9. #9
    Poker Professional Announced Tilt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    1,770

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve-O
    tourneys are geared toward calculated risk takers, cash games favor a disciplined player
    I disagree with that statement. I think one has to be very disciplined in order to win a tourney. I think a discipline player will know what risks will benefit him, thus a disciplined player is also a risk taker. Sure, people will make much bolder plays in tourneys, but it fits in with the style of play. I don't think you can make a generalized statement like that, and I don't think you can split the issue of ring vs. tourney that easily.

  10. #10
    PokerForums God
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    8,204

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve-O
    tourneys are geared toward calculated risk takers, cash games favor a disciplined player
    I think this is true.

    SnGs especially, you have to play different styles in a fairly short period of time.

    I think that bigger MTTs and ring games are more similar though.

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •