Cake Poker
Home
Forum
News
Articles
Site Reviews
Book Reviews
Interviews
Chat
Tournaments
60% Rakeback
50% RakebackNew!
125% Rakeback
Probabilities
Glossary
Poker Gear
Links
Advertise
User Name  
 
Password
Cookie?  
 
 
Poker Players on Launchpoker.com
LaunchPoker.com provides you with all the information you need about this year's WSOP event, from the 2008 WSOP schedule to the latest 2008 WSOP updates.
Online poker reviews of rooms such as Full Tilt Poker, Poker Stars and Titan Poker.
Extras

Cool Hand Poker. Get $350 Free!!
PokerListings

Go Back PokerForums.org > Strategy Discussion > General Poker Strategy > Should I not have even played this hand

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005, 11:09 AM
Fish Food
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 16
Trade Rating: (0)
Default Should I not have even played this hand

Just wondering what other people would have done with this hand. Would you even have played this it in this position.



30/60 Tourney Texas Hold'em Game Table (NL) (Tournament 17539446) -
Table Table 66963 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 8
Seat 1: incision69 (795)
Seat 2: pacmanmc (1170)
Seat 3: J_T_P_H (980)
Seat 4: madison66 (655)
Seat 5: Jag9286 (658)
Seat 6: mexipol_31 (1205)
Seat 7: cambece (890)
Seat 9: boyCB (1647)
madison66 posts small blind (15)
Jag9286 posts big blind (30)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to cambece [ Kd, Jc ]
mexipol_31 calls (30)
cambece calls (30)
boyCB calls (30)
incision69 folds.
pacmanmc calls (30)
J_T_P_H folds.
madison66 folds.
Jag9286 checks.
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 2h, Qd, Js ]
Jag9286 checks.
mexipol_31 checks.
cambece checks.
boyCB checks.
pacmanmc checks.
** Dealing Turn ** : [ Jd ]
Jag9286 checks.
mexipol_31 checks.
cambece checks.
boyCB bets (175)
pacmanmc folds.
Jag9286 folds.
mexipol_31 calls (175)
cambece calls (175)
** Dealing River ** : [ As ]
mexipol_31 checks.
cambece checks.
boyCB checks.
** Summary **
Main Pot: 690
Board: [ 2h Qd Js Jd As ]
incision69 balance 795, didn't bet (folded)
pacmanmc balance 1140, lost 30 (folded)
J_T_P_H balance 980, didn't bet (folded)
madison66 balance 640, lost 15 (folded)
Jag9286 balance 628, lost 30 (folded)
mexipol_31 balance 1000, lost 205 [ 5d Ad ] [ two pairs, aces and jacks -- Ad,As,Qd,Js,Jd ]
cambece balance 1375, bet 205, collected 690, net +485 [ Kd Jc ] [ three of a kind, jacks -- As,Kd,Jc,Js,Jd ]
boyCB balance 1442, lost 205 [ Td Ac ] [ two pairs, aces and jacks -- Ac,As,Qd,Js,Jd ]



Thanks
Cambece
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Cake Poker
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005, 11:31 AM
Fish Food
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 25
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

THE ONLY THINGS I COULD SEE IS A BET ON THE FLOP WOULD HAVE GIVEN YOU SOME ADDED INFO THAT MAY HAVE BEEN USEFULL WITH THE TEXTURE OF THE BOARD, A NICE CONTINUATION BET OF SAY TWO THIRDS OF THE POT AND THE SAME ON THE TURN ITS REALLY YOUR CHOICE AS TO CHECK WELL IF YOU HAD BET ON THE EITHER THE FLOP OR THE TURN YOU PROBABLY WOULD HAVE FELT MORE COMFORTABLE TO BET ON THE RIVER WHICH COULD HAVE MADE YOU MORE MONEY WHICH WINS/LOSSES DONT COUNT AT THE BUY IN COUNTER. AND GREAT HAND NICE JOB.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005, 11:35 AM
The Real DeCoy's Avatar
Poker Hustler
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,010
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

Don't listen to caps boy. Be very wary about starting with this hand UTG. Since you played it you should have reraised when you hit trips on the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005, 12:19 PM
Fish Food
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 16
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

Kidd I don't mind the caps but no periods is driving me nuts.

Anyway Decoy, I guess that was what I was thinking too since anyone with AJ would have probably raised preflop and someone with QJ probably would have slow played it from the flop.

I think I crippled myself though since I already knew it was a bad idea playing this hand utg but I was running dry for awhile and hadn't seen face cards so I figured I had to at least call.

Anyway thanks for the info
Cambece
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005, 12:44 PM
The Real DeCoy's Avatar
Poker Hustler
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,010
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

Don't feel the need to push when the chip stacks are rather balanced. However, if you catch those trips on the turn you need to make some money on them. Otherwise you took a big risk, got the reward cards, but didn't get reward money. You probably could have gotten at least 600 more chips and may have hit 1 or both of em for all-ins. If you did that you would be set for the tourney. I probably would have bet the 2/3-full pot.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-22-2005, 12:50 PM
Jason75's Avatar
Poker Hustler
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,230
Trade Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to Jason75
Default

I fold this one UTG every day of the week, and twice on sunday. Unless I'm so short I'm looking to push all in, then all the chips go in the middle.

But if you are going to play this hand (which again, I strongly disadvise), please raise it. This is not a speculative drawing hand, so by limping all you're doing is creating a small pot contested by a lot of players. A raise will often force out hands that dominate you, like AJ KQ, etc (obviously not AK), and some % of the time you'll take down the blinds (not that they're worth stealing). A raise also forces out the crap hands, and forces the other players to define their hands.

If you had raised it PF, then you could make a continuation/value bet (it's a mix of both because you'd have second pair but be backing up a PF raise) here on the flop, and probably take the pot down right here. Since you didn't raise before the flop, I probably don't bet the jacks for value (depends on the players yet to act, and if the players who have already checked are deceptive and likely to go for a check raise), and just check with 2 players to act behind me.

When I hit the trip jacks/good kicker against a board with a flush and straight draw, I'm not messing around. I bet at least the pot to take it down right there. If people want to draw out, I can't give them correct odds to do so. Note that if a diamond had come on the river, you'd have lost to the nut flush. The ace on the river is also a little bit of a scare card, because KT now has a straight, but I'm not really afraid of AJ here (because they had me beat on the turn anyway, and my aggressive bet would find that out).

In the end, you probably made more $ on this particular hand than I would, but I guarantee I lose a lot less when you do get beat. Over the long haul being aggressive is going to make more $ than fancy play.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 AM.

   Designed by
      
No Deposit Bonus
Poker Strategy
Poker Rooms
PartyPoker Bonus Codes
Poker Site USA
Online Casino Bonuses
Pokerspiele
Casinos That Accept USA Players
Poker Rakeback
Full Tilt bonus code
Rakeback
Casino
Nowadays in the Internet the Players are looking for a good Casino Bonus to find the best possible options for online Roulette.There is now the option of RtlPoker and a nice Casino Bonus to play some other games then just Poker.
The ideal casino site for gokkasten and even online poker including online casino games that can be found on mijn online casino, your casino information site for when gambling online or even offline.
Party Poker bonus code & room review
Tony G talks about his experinces in his blog
REVIEW OF PARADISE POKER WEBSITE
Online Poker Room Directory and latest poker news
Best Online Poker info on Internet!
Ultimate Bet new 40% deposit bonus
Copyright © 2004-2008 PokerForums.org, a Merendi Networks Inc. project.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.