I go broke 100% of the time here.
Ya can't win them all. Betting aggressively and calling down with extremely strong made hands is a good way to get your share of them.
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 11 to 16 of 16
Thread: What would you have done?
-
11-15-2005 #11Check Raiser
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 724
-You may not know this, but poker is a game of incomplete information.
-
11-15-2005 #12
Originally Posted by JokersWild
Personally, I push the king high flush as though it were the A high flush. Think how many times some joker has 56s and keeps firing away because he's made his flush. There you are with the K-high flush.
I'd start slowing down with the queen high flush (raise/call), because now there are 2 cards out that could beat us. But I'd still put a bet in at the river. Jack high or worse I'd still value bet, but probably not raise a bet.
In this particular situation, I'm going broke with any flush. I mean, how often in SB vs BB will both of us make the flush? Not enough times to run scared. The guy could just as easily have 89 or 92, or even J9, Q9, etc.
Sometimes, it's just our turn to go broke.
-
11-15-2005 #13Check Raiser
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 639
Yeah i when i think about it there were only like 7 pocket holdings that would have me beat.
-
11-15-2005 #14Chaser
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 157
I agree with you here for the most part. However, sometimes I personally do not feel it is necessary to risk my tournament life if I don't have to. I am satisfied winning a good pot rather than risk being booted. I know the odds are small that the K high flush will be beat but it does happen and the way the betting went at the turn is a good indicater that trouble is around the corner. This is where it helps to know if your opponent is a fish or is a decent player.
Originally Posted by Jason75
I am perhaps a bit conservative in tournaments when things are going as planned. Things would be different in a cash game.
-
11-15-2005 #15Check Raiser
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 639
shouldnt you being more conservative in cash game than you would be in a tourny? in a cash game you have infinite chances to make money but in tournament your only going to get a few really good chances? atleast this is what i seemed to gather from Harrington
-
11-15-2005 #16
IMO (I could be wrong), one of the differences between good tournament play and great tournament play is knowing when and how to push hands for full value. It can be the difference between taking down a nice sized pot and doubling your chipstack. This is one of those situations. The SB could easily be pushing 2 pair and discounting the flush (as I would in the SB) or even have made a worse flush (there's only 1 better).
Originally Posted by JokersWild
Even though we end up near broke on this play, I feel pretty strongly it's the play to make. We just got incredibly unlucky. But that's poker.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
