Cake Poker
Home
Forum
News
Articles
Site Reviews
Book Reviews
Interviews
Chat
Tournaments
60% Rakeback
50% RakebackNew!
125% Rakeback
Probabilities
Glossary
Poker Gear
Links
Advertise
User Name  
 
Password
Cookie?  
 
 
Poker Players on Launchpoker.com
LaunchPoker.com provides you with all the information you need about this year's WSOP event, from the 2008 WSOP schedule to the latest 2008 WSOP updates.
Online poker reviews of rooms such as Full Tilt Poker, Poker Stars and Titan Poker.
Extras

Cool Hand Poker. Get $350 Free!!
PokerListings

Go Back PokerForums.org > Strategy Discussion > General Poker Strategy > Would you have played this differently?

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2005, 06:35 PM
WotaWaster's Avatar
PokerForums God
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Luton, England
Posts: 5,032
Trade Rating: (6)
Limits Played: $2-$4 NL
Send a message via AIM to WotaWaster Send a message via MSN to WotaWaster Send a message via Yahoo to WotaWaster
Default Would you have played this differently?

I had just doubled up of karphammar after hitting trip queens with my AQ to beat his kings (All in was after I hit 3rd queen) and so felt there was a possibility he was on tilt or desperate to beat me, especially as the $10 bet seemed over strong. He seemed quite an aggresive player anyway.

I tehn had this hand:
I felt that I was winning on the turn, but once he called my raise I felt he could clearly have been beating me. When he checked the river, should I have made a bet? I felt there was too many hands he could have had which were beating me, however if he had a bigger hand maybe he would have reraised me on turn or bet out on the river as it seemed I would call?

Would anybody have done anything differently?



***** Hand History for Game 2876113294 *****
$50 NL Texas Hold'em - Friday, November 11, 20:50:53 EDT 2005
Table Table 36597 (Real Money)
Seat 7 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: karphammar ( $59.50 )
Seat 2: jalex42 ( $45.94 )
Seat 3: blaidan7 ( $23.79 )
Seat 4: VampireFox ( $4.65 )
Seat 5: atticus001 ( $34.55 )
Seat 6: WotaWaster1 ( $50.52 )
Seat 7: JJRigby ( $96.50 )
Seat 9: patrlot ( $56.25 )
Seat 10: scrmlovr2 ( $47.15 )
scrmlovr2 posts small blind [$0.25].
karphammar posts big blind [$0.50].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to WotaWaster1 [ As Qh ]
jalex42 folds.
blaidan7 folds.
VampireFox folds.
atticus001 folds.
WotaWaster1 raises [$2].
JJRigby folds.
scrmlovr2 folds.
karphammar calls [$1.50].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 9s, 8c, Ac ]
karphammar checks.
WotaWaster1 bets [$3].
karphammar calls [$3].
** Dealing Turn ** [ 6s ]
karphammar bets [$10].
>You have options at Table 36628 Table!.
WotaWaster1 raises [$20].
karphammar calls [$10].
** Dealing River ** [ 3h ]
karphammar checks.
WotaWaster1 checks.
karphammar shows [ Ah, Js ] a pair of aces.
WotaWaster1 shows [ As, Qh ] a pair of aces.
WotaWaster1 wins $47.75 from the main pot with a pair of aces with queen kicker.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Cake Poker
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2005, 06:59 PM
Eclipse86's Avatar
Poker Professional
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,617
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

hmm.. i think u played this fine.. maybe bet a bit more on the flop.. like 4 dollars?
ur check on the river was good too.. u dont want to risk losing anymore money just incase he had AK, which is a strong possibility.. so i'd rather check and take down the pot as is if he had the AJ, rather then put in another river bet and lose even more money to him if he actually had the AK

doesnt seem like he would have a set in this hand.. because he didnt raise u on the flop, or reraise u on the turn, plus he didnt bet on the river.., especially when the board is draw heavy.. so the only two hands i could put him on is AJ and AK.. so ur river check was a good play..
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2005, 10:11 PM
Check Raiser
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 724
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

He could have had TJ, KQc, middle pair (unlikely though).

I like the check behind... in this case he's either drawing, or he's got an Ace. If he's drawing, betting is pointless (but not wrong... a 3 doesn't complete anything). So you should be if you think he would play many Aces here (like A7) and is a weak player, and check behind if he's strong and tight. Of course, if he's good and you're not a maniac, he should have played back with AK.
__________________
-You may not know this, but poker is a game of incomplete information.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2005, 09:35 AM
Jason75's Avatar
Poker Hustler
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,230
Trade Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to Jason75
Default

Don't bet medium strength hands at the river if given the opportunity to showdown for nothing. You'll only usually get a call if you're beat, so it's a net $ loser.

Your raise on the turn is far too small to give you any real info. Make a significant raise that at least gives him 3:1 or worse odds. This raise screams "I've got a good kicker but not a great one and I'm really worried about it". If I saw such a weak raise, I might make a big reraise here.

In the end, your opponent gets punished for making a loose call PF out of position.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2005, 09:10 PM
Check Raiser
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 724
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason75
Don't bet medium strength hands at the river if given the opportunity to showdown for nothing. You'll only usually get a call if you're beat, so it's a net $ loser.
This is only true if you're playing against strong, reasonable opponents. If your opponents typically call down with hands like A7 or an unimproved middle pair in these kind of situations, then value betting against them is obviously profitable.

Generalizations are ALWAYS wrong ( )
__________________
-You may not know this, but poker is a game of incomplete information.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11-13-2005, 01:16 PM
WotaWaster's Avatar
PokerForums God
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Luton, England
Posts: 5,032
Trade Rating: (6)
Limits Played: $2-$4 NL
Send a message via AIM to WotaWaster Send a message via MSN to WotaWaster Send a message via Yahoo to WotaWaster
Default

Jason,

Given that there was about $20 in the pot and I had to put in $10 to call. I would then of had to go all in to give him pot odds like 3-1, by which point if he calls and I am losing it is too late to change anything.

Maybe reraise to $30 instead of $20?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:25 AM.

   Designed by
      
No Deposit Bonus
Poker Strategy
Poker Rooms
PartyPoker Bonus Codes
Poker Site USA
Online Casino Bonuses
Pokerspiele
Casinos That Accept USA Players
Poker Rakeback
Full Tilt bonus code
Rakeback
Casino
Nowadays in the Internet the Players are looking for a good Casino Bonus to find the best possible options for online Roulette.There is now the option of RtlPoker and a nice Casino Bonus to play some other games then just Poker.
The ideal casino site for gokkasten and even online poker including online casino games that can be found on mijn online casino, your casino information site for when gambling online or even offline.
Party Poker bonus code & room review
Tony G talks about his experinces in his blog
REVIEW OF PARADISE POKER WEBSITE
Online Poker Room Directory and latest poker news
Best Online Poker info on Internet!
Ultimate Bet new 40% deposit bonus
Copyright © 2004-2008 PokerForums.org, a Merendi Networks Inc. project.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.