Raising a flush or an open-ended straight draw, in position, on the come, is a very common play in limit hold'em. Like any other play, it can neither be overused nor attempted regardless of the circumstances. But when used properly, it can have many beneficial results, not the least of which is securing a free card on the turn when everyone left in the pot checks to the raiser.Originally Posted by traz
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 21 to 23 of 23
Thread: Playing Overcards
-
11-08-2005 #21River Rat
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA
- Posts
- 478
Last edited by mxp2004; 11-08-2005 at 07:43 PM.
-
11-08-2005 #22
That was the point of the Poker Stove input. We're not taking into account which hands are likely to be calling two bets on the flop. The point was that if they do call, even with random hands, you're still a minor dog making this a -EV. If they call with non-random hands (use standard starting hands from EP as an example) that becomes an even greater -EV.
Originally Posted by PJ of TheGame
I've raised from position with the nut flush draw on the flop. Usually because I have that draw, and an over card. I won't make that move with just a K or Q and I won't do it with JUST an OESD. When I do this, I'm not only knocking people out (in case my A hits and TPMK becomes a winning hand) but also because I want to build the pot for the times that the flush hits. Raising with 2 overcards alone (hoping that TPGK is good at the end of the hand) is not a move I would make.
That being said, I guess there is a decent arguement to make, I just don't see how the numbers, or stratagy, or over all table image you may want to present would play into it.
Against a large field of weak passive players, I feel this move becomes even more -EV because of the likely hood that their going to call down with their Ax and the likely hood that you're going to narrow the field enough to make a pair of kings good (often enough to push this to a +EV) is far slimmer. I would rather play against a tricky agressive player who has the sense to put me on a hand that I may not have and possibly fold a better hand.Trons
Originally Posted by Jason75
JstTrons
Toyotatruck

-
11-08-2005 #23
Calling is awful. You open up the possibilty of someone with better position to raise you and it doesn't dissuede the flop opener into not betting into you on the turn, the chance of getting a free card for half the turn bet by raising the flop bet is too good to pass up by just calling.
Raising and folding both have merits and it soley depends on the usual play of the people behind you. Against straightforward players that will only three bet or call with a really great hand (which on this board is really only 1010, 77, 33, 89 and A10) then I raise everytime. The chance of them having one of these specific hands is very low. You need to get the other people with overcards out and by just calling you only encourage them to stick around. It is very unlikely that straightforward players will coldcall 2 or threebet bluff with anything but these hands.
Against tricky aggressive players that like to make crazy plays at pots I fold. The majority of live 4-8 players (which is what I usually play) are not in this category, so most of the time I am raising this. The pot is big enough that investing 2 flop bets and a turn bet means I only have to succeed 1:3 times or so to make it worth it. This is the same arguement I made in the SB trash thread. But again it is critical the people behind you are not aggressive AND tricky (if they are just aggressive it is not as bad since if you decide to get out you know you were behind anyway).
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote