Originally Posted by DaY99

Sure hold me to it on several conditions.

1) People who read your book are satisfied with your "logical" theories and sign a document stating why the book is relevant to the poker world.

Deal.

Originally Posted by Tristan

And what about a control? AA and KK aren't dealt out every hand.

Grab the freaking deck pull out 2 kings and 2 aces, shuffle the deck and deal out the flop/turn/river do this over again 100 times or however many times it takes mentally challenged people to figure out common sense. Write down the results and post them.

whats your fucking question?

Why can't someone actually provide an answer?

ok tristan the pythagorean theorum is a no more than theory provide me a triangle it doesnt work for besides one with 2 sides that measure one.

Originally Posted by Tristan

Why can't someone actually provide an answer?

why cant you say something that makes sense?

Originally Posted by Tristan

Why can't someone actually provide an answer?

Find out the answer yourself numbnuts go test it yourself with your own deck of cards, stop arguing when you dont have the balls to try it yourself to find out how much of a moron you are.

Originally Posted by surftheiop

ok tristan the pythagorean theorum is a no more than theory provide me a triangle it doesnt work for besides one with 2 sides that measure one.

Hows about a triangle where the lengths of the sides are constantly changing, much like a deck of cards changes as it it shuffled?

There is logic for you.

Originally Posted by nu2mdwst2

why cant you say something that makes sense?

Why can't you? All I've seen is you chomping at the bit, while I've been trying to actually maintain discussion to a degree.

ChieF: For this experiment, since AA only comes up against KK 4% of the time (not my stat, someone else worked that out) Should we only actually take the results of 4/100 hands dealt? If so, which ones? Do you now see why I am asking if anyone can direct me to a source where such a study has already been carried out?

Originally Posted by Tristan

Why can't you? All I've seen is you chomping at the bit, while I've been trying to actually maintain discussion to a degree.

ChieF: For this experiment, since AA only comes up against KK 4% of the time (not my stat, someone else worked that out) Should we only actually take the results of 4/100 hands dealt? If so, which ones? Do you now see why I am asking if anyone can direct me to a source where such a study has already been carried out?

It doesnt matter BECAUSE THE REST OF THE 48 CARDS INTHE DECK ARE EXACTLY THE SAME!!!!!!!!!!!