PokerStars Game #253861: Hold'em Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2005/09/09 - 21:17:05 (ET)
Table 'Handahl' Seat #8 is the button
Seat 1: reelman43 ($3.35 in chips)
Seat 2: marbear4646 ($21.05 in chips)
Seat 3: jorgeallen ($10.85 in chips)
Seat 4: jerrysak ($9.10 in chips)
Seat 5: fadacai ($37.20 in chips)
Seat 6: bonchkid ($18.90 in chips)
Seat 7: Jammy77 ($12.90 in chips)
Seat 8: mobaby1966 ($8.85 in chips)
Seat 9: confueled ($31.30 in chips)
Seat 10: brick566 ($4.75 in chips)
confueled: posts small blind $0.10
brick566: posts big blind $0.25
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to bonchkid [Qc Qh]
reelman43: folds
marbear4646: calls $0.25
reelman43 leaves the table
jorgeallen: calls $0.25
jerrysak: calls $0.25
fadacai: folds
bonchkid: raises $0.25 to $0.50
Jammy77: folds
mobaby1966: folds
confueled: folds
brick566: calls $0.25
marbear4646: calls $0.25
jorgeallen: calls $0.25
jerrysak: calls $0.25
*** FLOP *** [5d 6s 2d]
brick566: checks
marbear4646: bets $0.25
jorgeallen: folds
jerrysak: calls $0.25
bonchkid: raises $0.25 to $0.50
brick566: calls $0.50
marbear4646: calls $0.25
jerrysak: calls $0.25
*** TURN *** [5d 6s 2d] [Tc]
brick566: bets $0.50
marbear4646: folds
jerrysak: calls $0.50
bonchkid: folds
Jopke gets called on river and shows 34
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 1 to 10 of 24
Thread: You guys will HATE this one
-
09-09-2005 #1
You guys will HATE this one
Last edited by bonchkid; 09-10-2005 at 02:36 PM.
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
09-09-2005 #2River Rat
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 356
That was a great laydown on your part. You know at those lower stakes games that kind of thing will happen more often. If you even move up to .50/1.00 with a raise in the same example that guy with 3,4 would be gone. You should really shoot for playing 2/4 where you have people who know the game but are still weak. In other words they know how to fold.
-
09-09-2005 #3
I've played higher than 2/4 even dabbling in some 5/10. I just withdrew all but $100 from my account though. Sorata enjoying the re-building process in a sick way.
AND I DONT WANT THE 34o GUY GONE!!!!“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
09-09-2005 #4PokerForums God
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 8,204
That is not a great laydown
-
09-09-2005 #5
hence the capital hate.
Sorta mocking chief here too ^^
But I'd do it again.“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
09-09-2005 #6
when u got such a good read u really gotta lay it down....when u know u just know.
do i sense a 1000 page thread coming on where u try and convince everyone that u KNEW he had it?
-
09-09-2005 #7
This guy wouldn't bet AT here. He's that passive. I figured he had a set.
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
09-09-2005 #8PokerForums God
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 8,204
that is such horrible thinking in limit.
look at the percentage of the time you have to be right.
that fold is completely stupid.
-
09-09-2005 #9
I'm getting 6:1 and 2 outs at best.
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
09-09-2005 #10Poker Professional
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 1,670
maybe 10% of the time you need 2 outs... still have to make the calldown with an overpair at .25/.50
Originally Posted by bonchkid
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
