I like to check behind on the river if I think he may have been drawing and there's a possibility he hit it. I like the check.
I don't like the flat call on the flop though. .45 into a 1.80 pot is a big underbet... I would have re-raised to about 1.80, still much less then the pot but enough to milk some more money out of him. If he called that I'd put in a full pot-sized bet on the turn, and check behind on the river if he called down again and that came down.
In that specific spot, I don't think he's drawing though. I think he's got top pair weak kicker. He bet out on the flop to see if his hand was any good, and wanted to check it down to try and keep you honest. I'd put him rather narrowly on T9, JT, 99, 88, 77, QT if he's weak.Of those, the only hand that beats you is 77 and it'd be a river.loss.
Edit- the more I think about this, in this case a value bet on the river would probably be good because of the range of hands I have him on. If he's got a weak pair that he wants to check/call down, there's a lot of hands that he could call a half pot or pot sized bet with that you COULD beat, and only a couple that you can't, and he really hasn't been playing like he's got a monster he's waiting to check-raise the river with.
__________________
-You may not know this, but poker is a game of incomplete information.
Last edited by PJ of TheGame; 08-31-2005 at 06:08 PM.
|