Welcome to PokerForums.org

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    Poker Professional
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack King off
    sklanksy obv
    mason malmuth actually, sklansky just put his name and 2+2 on it

  2. #12
    Check Raiser
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    724

    Default

    I have heard that winning greater then 75% of your showdowns probably means that you're playing too tight and not bluffing/value betting enough on the river.
    -You may not know this, but poker is a game of incomplete information.

  3. #13
    Poker Expert poker player 100's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    united states
    Posts
    1,416

    Default

    I say Dont do take out all you're bankroll into one strategy. You can adapt to SS(h). But if you start going on a losing streak it miught be bad luck or just the strategy you're dealing with
    Poker

    NBA

  4. #14
    Poker Professional
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PJ of TheGame
    I have heard that winning greater then 75% of your showdowns probably means that you're playing too tight and not bluffing/value betting enough on the river.
    75% is a rediculous number. shoot for 51-55

  5. #15
    PokerForums God Marm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cleveland
    Posts
    9,757

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bboy
    mason malmuth actually, sklansky just put his name and 2+2 on it
    No, Ed Miller wrote it, and then Sklansky and Malmuth tacked their names on it.

    You should be looking for about 18%-22% flops with SSH, depending on how you play (I leaned more towards 18 while beavis was more along 22%, but he did have a higher winrate), and bboy is right on the showdwon stats, 75% is not practical.

    The biggest concept to understand from this book is Equity. The reason you are being very aggressive with marginal hands is because they actually have a large share of the pot's Equity when compared to the other hands in play. Your hand stands a better chance than the others to win at showdown, so you bet your ass off. This is playing the odds at its finest. Yes its scary when you first read it and go "You want me to play WHAT UTG? I usually fold Q9s from LP!"
    Last edited by Marm; 09-01-2005 at 12:36 PM.
    Marm is back, maybe. Been off for 3 years. Rusty as Hell.

    Luck is a Residue of Design.

  6. #16
    Poker Professional
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    1,670

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Marm
    No, Ed Miller wrote it, and then Sklansky and Malmuth tacked their names on it.
    thanks, actually got him confused with mason. i knew it was the wierd 3rd guy that wrote it

    sorry, now i feel like an idiot

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •