Ok I dont know who fucked this one up more, so please tell me. MP2 had been playing a lot fo hands, and had pushed/called all-in with weak draws before, MP1 seemd relatively tight, hadnt played many hands, and had folded alot. I put them both on overs, and was pretty sure that MP1 would go away to my isolation rereraise. at this point, I was pretty sure that MP2 hit a set, and MP1 really had overs, so I'm not sure if making him pay to see the overs was such a good idea since there was no sidepot created yet.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (9 handed) converter

saw flop|saw showdown

SB ($4.10)
BB ($9.90)
Hero ($18.10)
UTG+1 ($3.40)
MP1 ($10.90)
MP2 ($3.15)
MP3 ($2)
CO ($4.50)
Button ($14.20)

Preflop: Hero is UTG with , . MP3 posts a blind of $0.10.
Hero calls $0.10, 1 fold, MP1 calls $0.10, MP2 raises to $0.4, MP3 (poster) calls $0.30, 4 folds, Hero calls $0.30, MP1 calls $0.30.

Flop: ($1.75) , , (4 players)
Hero bets $1.25, MP1 calls $1.25, MP2 raises to $2.75, MP3 folds, Hero raises to $15, MP1 calls $9.25 (All-In).

Turn: ($30) (3 players, 1 all-in)

River: ($30) (3 players, 1 all-in)

Final Pot: $30
Main Pot: $10, between Hero, MP1 and MP2. > Pot won by MP1 ($10).
Pot 2: $20, between Hero and MP2. > Pot won by MP2 ($20).

Results in white below:
Hero has 9c 9h (one pair, nines).
MP1 has Td 9d (flush, ten high).
MP2 has 5s 5c (three of a kind, fives).
Outcome: MP2 wins $20. MP1 wins $10.

__________________

why are you trying to isolate the player that you're "pretty sure" has you beat? and one that you're drawing dead to 2 cards? you pretty much said it yourself, so i'll stop...tough situation though...you gotta try to think what exactly he'd be raising with that you would have beat...not much IMO