Welcome to PokerForums.org

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Poker Professional xxdemexx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,837

    Default Limit v's No-limit Pokertracker question

    Just a quick quesiton for anyone using Pokertracker for LIMIT poker

    Could someone go to their summary page and find the ratio of winning to losing sessions for ALL players for NoLimit this is

    60% losers : 40% winners

    I'm interested in this because these two numbers seem immutable in NL - I think its a function of the cards. I just wonder if its the same for limit and if it isn't - then why isn' t it?

    Obviously need 10k hands +
    See me playing $10/$20NL like it was play money

    http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...405&q=xxdemexx

    Doberman: "but Sarge, isn't poker gambling and just luck?"
    Sgt. Bilko:" not the way I play it"

  2. #2
    (Formerly Steve-O) Steve Ruddock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    5,966

    Default

    mine is similar for limit around 60/40
    Read my musings on poker and life at Online Poker Examiner, Poker Examiner, PokerNewsBoy.com, and My Poker Blog

  3. #3
    Poker Professional xxdemexx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,837

    Default hum

    thought it be ...
    See me playing $10/$20NL like it was play money

    http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...405&q=xxdemexx

    Doberman: "but Sarge, isn't poker gambling and just luck?"
    Sgt. Bilko:" not the way I play it"

  4. #4
    PokerForums God Marm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cleveland
    Posts
    9,757

    Default

    OK, just gave my computer an aneurysm looking for ALL players... but heres my numbers: 42% winners, 57% losers.

    I was wondering about that for a while now, they say only 20% are winners, I think they are wrong.
    Marm is back, maybe. Been off for 3 years. Rusty as Hell.

    Luck is a Residue of Design.

  5. #5
    PokerForums God the alex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Nort Side o' Shi-kawgo
    Posts
    7,959

    Default

    stakes- winners:losers
    NL- 41/58
    limit- 34/65

    My limit games are mostly 6 max., so the numbers for that are a bit off the scale. I'm surprised that it was off that much and this is in about 60k hands.

    65% is a lot. Wow!
    Quote Originally Posted by FaDi View Post
    GodFadiR (12:32:45 AM): but lets be honest
    GodFadiR (12:32:48 AM): who doesnt wanna fuck me
    WotaWotaWota (12:33:22 AM): I do
    WotaWotaWota (12:33:27 AM): in tehanus

  6. #6
    (Formerly Steve-O) Steve Ruddock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    5,966

    Default

    its not that 40% are winners, 40% of what you have seen are winners.

    I would assume this since when you sit at a fresh table some people win some lose, but the people you have multiple stats on are probably winners or they would disappear. So not only do you have the winners but you have losers who when you played with them have a winning session or 2.
    Read my musings on poker and life at Online Poker Examiner, Poker Examiner, PokerNewsBoy.com, and My Poker Blog

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •