Welcome to PokerForums.org

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Chaser
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    122

    Default winning more on drawing hands compared to premuim hands

    Hi all ,

    I have been mulling over this for a few weeks now and I'm becoming
    convinced that drawing hands seem to win more than premuim ones...
    I guess this is assuming the betting is low enough to allow the
    drawing hand to play , still I have played and seen on tv , that the
    drawing hand makes more money....
    by drawing hands I give a few examples .. KJ , QJ ,A2 suited,A4 , A5, K10,10J,Q10,89,76,45,52,910 ,,etc....
    What do u guys think ..?

  2. #2
    Fish
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    36

    Default

    Premium hands are more profitable. You need to learn to let get rid of them in certain spots. Not saying drawing hands are not profitable in the right situtions. They play better in postion, in loose passive games and when stacks are deeper

  3. #3
    Chaser
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rakebackdonkeys View Post
    Premium hands are more profitable. You need to learn to let get rid of them in certain spots. .
    yes , but I have started a scary trend (for myself) of "protecting" my
    premuim hands too much , i.e pre-flop , therefore "only" winning the blinds
    and wotever else was called , I know I probably sound a bit greedy in
    wanting more , but I can't get into a bad habit (imo) of being too scared
    to let the premuim hands "play" , if that makes sense ....
    What do u guys think about this ? is it a common fear ?

  4. #4
    Chaser
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    122

    Default

    let me elaborate a little more , this play has been mainly on the pc , vs the pc..
    however the live poker play in my area is bad as well , the guys are very very loose , I must admit I do "let" the premium hands "play"
    more often in live play ....much more often in fact ....is the pc progam (stacked) forcing me to "over-protect" premuim hands ..do u think?
    hope this all sort of makes sense ...lol
    btw just a note , in the live play in my area, even having the "best premium hand" does not "scare" these guys off easily , most of them
    will still call or raise with a nothing hand .... then I will face the similar scenerio encountered in the pc program ...and get right back
    to "over-protection" .. just a side note again lol, in chess there's a well loved term "over-protection" , and in chess it's a good thing ...
    Last edited by ninjax; 02-24-2010 at 05:25 AM.

  5. #5
    Fish
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    36

    Default

    I know nothing about the program "stacked". Fron what I can tell that your referring to by protecting your premium hands too much by over raising the pot pre this can be a big mistake live players make. Don't be the guy in a 1/2 game that opens AA for $40. I open all my hands pre for a standard size pot raise. This has its pro and cons. The biggest benefit is that I can open alot more hands and have a real balance to my starting hands but there is alot more cons to this approach. One being you give bigger implied odds especially when stacks are deep and the other being live players will call over sized raises pre on a regular basis. If you are having trouble playing premium hands post flop you need to find the balance between the standard pot sized raise and the huge over raise that will get you 1-2 callers that will make your hand much easier to play. A good starting point in a 1/2 game would be $12 plus $2 for ever caller all ready in the pot.

  6. #6
    Chaser
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    122

    Default

    thanks for the advice , the program "stacked" is apparently co-produced by negreanu ....apparently , lol.
    I m not one of "those" ppl who raise like 10x the blinds , I raise the normal 3x bb , and then they fold - mostly , as for the live players , I have "dealt"
    with one set of them so far (the more proffessional set if u will) , the other looser set I'm yet to deal with ...I think its' thier format which was killing
    me ....viz , 50 chips (single value for all chips) and blinds 1/2 , then 2/4 then if some1 gets kicked out blinds are doubled i.e 4/8 ,
    I just got there (yesterday) and within 10mins (and no good hands, premuim or otherwise) the blinds were 4/8 , which is almost a 5th of my stack
    and after a small fold and 2 bb , I only had like 28chips and decided (probably wrongly) to go all in with 22 , was called and a guy managed a straight
    on the river... I don't think I will play that format in future .... (any advice if I do play?)
    But I will take the advice of 3x bb betting , I usually don't do this as I like to "take the risk" and just raise 1x bb ,
    however I guess the pro's 3xbb for a reason , and doing it consistently hides the value of ur cards at the same time "builds the pot"
    who would think one would need to do this in NL ?..... however I guess one has to ...lol , I didn't really realise this before .... ( I knew about pot-building in limit holdem).

  7. #7
    Fish
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    36

    Default

    As far as the 50 chip game that you play. It can still be profitable but with extremely high variance. It sounds more like a tournament and I would play it that way. When you have less then 10 bb your only play is to shove all-in or fold. With stacks this short the drawing hands go way down in value but can be very profitable when shoving in position. For example your on the button with 8bb's with 56s and it folds around to you. Don't be afraid to shove here. The blinds going to fold the majority of the time and your going to pick up the 1.5bb's and increase your stack by almost 20%. Even when your called your hand will play better against there range then a hand like A3.

  8. #8
    Chaser
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    122

    Default

    thanks , maybe will give that format one more try , but it just doesn't "feel" like "normal" poker , ha ha I wonder how strange I must sound
    sometimes but yeah ,
    btw the other "set of ppl I played" thier format was much much better , chip values for different colours , total chip count around 50k
    chip values like 100/200/500/1000/5000 , this format was more like "normal" poker ..lol , and no doubling of the blinds when some1 goes out ....
    the problem is the better format guys play only every 6 weeks or so .. whereas the worse 50chip guys play every week ...... makes me wonder
    whether they just like throwing money away ...? ha ha ha ....
    On the main issue , I will update on my progress in "stacked" and the 3xbb story ....
    thanks again

  9. #9
    Chaser
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rakebackdonkeys View Post
    One being you give bigger implied odds

    I have already noticed this , as I have had a few hands and 3xbb pre-flop
    get a caller almost everytime depending on position of course ...
    And the caller (in "stacked") , at times has a tendency to re-raise
    early on , but this is fine for me and I call , and so far have won every
    hand that this has happened in ... (3 or 4) and the good part in relation
    to the thread title is that with my premium hand even pre-flop
    there's already a sizable pot to be had ! :-) ,
    will see how it goes after more hands ....

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts