This is a $1/2 limit party table, that is semi-tight with fairly weak players. MP3 is a semi-loose passive player. Button is a semi-tight aggressive player views me as loose aggressive instead of tight aggressive.

Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (9 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is MP2 with , .
3 folds, Hero raises, MP3 calls, 1 fold, Button 3-bets, 2 folds, Hero calls, MP3 calls.

Flop: (10.50 SB) , , (3 players)
Hero checks, MP3 checks, Button bets, Hero raises, MP3 3-bets, Button calls, Hero caps, MP3 calls, Button calls.

Turn: (11.25 BB) (3 players)
Hero bets, MP3 raises, Button folds, Hero 3-bets, MP3 caps, Hero calls.

River: (19.25 BB) (2 players)
Hero bets, MP3 raises, Hero 3-bets, MP3 calls.

Final Pot: 25.25 BB

Shouldn't this be in the glory corner?

You flopped top set, checkraised on the flop and got capped, bet out the turn & got capped, & bet out the river.

You played it perfectly, IMO including PF. The guy's either an idiot with AK of clubs or 109 of clubs or he's unlucky (but still an idiot for raising pre-flop) with 77 or 88.

What are you asking about? If you should have capped PF?

Am i missing the result here? I'm willing to bet he lost on the river to MP3 who had a 10. If that is the case i don't know what else you could have done. You played the hand pretty much how you had to until you 3 bet the river. I would have called the river once MP3 raised in fear of the 10. I know it's not much but you would have saved yourself 1BB rather than lost it if he did river the straight.

Originally Posted by GTSamIAm

The guy didn't raise preflop. The person I showdowned was immediately to my left and smooth called my pf raise. The SB? or BB? i dont remember 3-bet pf.

And the second reply, I was hero, so I bet the river and got check-raised then 3-bet. He has a tendency to slowplay strong hands pf so I thought he had AA or KK so surely that I went ahead and 3-bet the river.

No you open bet on the river (that's what the converter says) and MP3 raised and you 3 bet. There was no check raise after the river. The raise on the river with 4 to the straight would have had me just call with fear of a 10. Like I said before, it would save you a BB. Am I right that he flipped over a 10?

Originally Posted by Q10 soooted

Shouldn't this be in the glory corner?
You flopped top set, checkraised on the flop and got capped, bet out the turn & got capped, & bet out the river.
You played it perfectly, IMO including PF. The guy's either an idiot with AK of clubs or 109 of clubs or he's unlucky (but still an idiot for raising pre-flop) with 77 or 88.
What are you asking about? If you should have capped PF?

*sigh* That's what I get for posting first to a new thread and not reading it through S-L-O-W-L-Y.

I still think you played it right except I wouldn't have re-raised the river. If this guy played 109 and hit his flop you got unlucky. If he has A10 of clubs and fished you on the river you want more of him playing at your table. I think his actions are still consistent with a 2-pair player or even a flush draw that got angry and thought that you'd fold to the river raise (although that would be quite bad).

I did, however, manage in my first post to not only miss the button betting on the flop & folding on the turn but I also ignored the 1 card straight and the fact that J10 clubs would be a BAD thing for the other guy to have. I need more coffee - I'll leave this to more sensible people.

Definatly overplayed. Marm is correct. For some reason, flopping sets to other people's straights is my theme this week, lol. I'd say you are looking at 9T. Since it is 1/2 I'll say its 9T but I don't know why he didn't cap river, what is he scared of... QT doesn't play that hand quite that aggressively, lol.