Welcome to PokerForums.org

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    Chaser
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    191

    Default ICM consideration

    hello
    I was reading about ICM on chillin411 ( The Independent Chip Model – Examining a Bubble Hand | Chillin411.com ) and they consider this situation:

    S&G with 10 people, 50%, 30%, 20% prizes, 4 people left (BUBBLE), blinds 200/400
    You have 2200 chips, and to your left, 2400, 3600, and 1800, respectively.

    So here they suggest pushing all-in with 89s in the smallblind is good considering that the big blind will call 15% of the time.
    The conclusion is:
    "So, if we fold, we have an ICM value of 0.2354 if we fold, and an ICM value of 0.2426 if we push."


    I also agree with that play, and usually did it before knowing ICM in many similar situations, but for other reasons.
    Instead of considering the average of the ICM (0.2354 if fold and 0.2426 if push), I prefer considering the separated values (he folds, he calls and I lose, he calls and I win), because:
    - he folds: ok, I got a new blind (and some antes), and I'm at least breaking even for this round
    - he call and I lose: I'm out with $0
    - he calls and I win: I doubled-up and he's "pratically" left

    So even if he calls and I get a winning probability of 36%, I think it's still pretty decent, because, if I win I'll not only already be ITM, but also be the chip leader (what gives me more room to steal blinds and control the table)

    Don't you think this kind of "reward" should also be considered on the ITM (I didn't read enough about ITM, so I'm not sure it really isn't)?
    Last edited by kavelot; 06-25-2008 at 12:25 PM.

  2. #2
    PokerForums God DeeYakaBaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    5,402

    Default

    Pushing this hand is correct as 98s is a slight favourite(a little >50%) over a random hand so 85% of the time ur winning the substantial blinds uncontested and 15% of the time when the bb calls u, ur gonna be a slight favourite to double up.

    Strictly speaking, based on ICM and considering the stacks (and without me bothering to look in detail at any numbers to back my spouting up), the bb should not really call your push with anything less than AA so ur almost getting a walk even tho ur in the sb.

    Playing nitty as hell is common to see while down to the bubble but im this is the time to go and win a SNG by being aggressive and putting others to big decisions, especially if a small stack has folded and ur stack is bigger than those left to act.
    For the best rakeback rates, greatest choice of poker rooms, more promotions, tournaments and bigger $$$ freerolls than any other rakeback affiliate, visit RakeTheRake, one of the largest and most reputable poker rakeback affiliates in the world.

    Get constant bonuses and superb customer support at RedKings. (Non-US only){its rigged for me but prob not u}

  3. #3
    Poker Hustler 4tun8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,127

    Default

    My newbdom shines through because pushing all in with 89s on the bubble seems stupid to me. Regardless of the statistical information. I'm in it to win it but I'd rather win it someway else I guess.

  4. #4
    Chaser
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    191

    Default

    I think it depends on a lot of factor, but you don't want the other guy to call... you want him to fold
    if you're pushing all the time, or playing loose, you shouldn't do that (in fact, you shouldn't be playing this way to start with)
    but let's say you got AK, went all-in... then got JJ, all-in
    next hand you shouldn't go all-in again with 89s, because you'll most likely be called with K high (only very good players would suspect that a 3rd all-in in sequence probably means you have a really big hand)

  5. #5
    piv
    piv is offline
    Stu Ungar piv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,740

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeeYakaBaka View Post
    Strictly speaking, based on ICM and considering the stacks (and without me bothering to look in detail at any numbers to back my spouting up), the bb should not really call your push with anything less than AA so ur almost getting a walk even tho ur in the sb.
    wtffffff

  6. #6
    Stu Ungar OrionPro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,671

    Default

    shoving with 98s is the right play, as well as the BB calling with about 15%

    Call hands: 66+,A8o+,A6s+,KJo+,KTs+ (15%)

    Of course it depends on the BB. If he's crazy loose here and calls with any two, it's a bad shove. But almost nobody plays this way
    Last edited by OrionPro; 06-29-2008 at 07:31 AM.

  7. #7
    Poker Hustler 4tun8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    1,127

    Default

    Maybe where you play lol.............back at the kiddie tables with me............I'll get called.

  8. #8
    Poker Professional classickred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,676

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeeYakaBaka View Post
    Pushing this hand is correct as 98s is a slight favourite(a little >50%) over a random hand so 85% of the time ur winning the substantial blinds uncontested and 15% of the time when the bb calls u, ur gonna be a slight favourite to double up.
    if his range is atc you're a slight favorite, but it's not. As Orion said above, a 15% range is 66+,A8o+,A6s+,KJo+,KTs+

    Quote Originally Posted by DeeYakaBaka View Post
    Strictly speaking, based on ICM and considering the stacks (and without me bothering to look in detail at any numbers to back my spouting up), the bb should not really call your push with anything less than AA so ur almost getting a walk even tho ur in the sb.
    wat

  9. #9
    PokerForums God DeeYakaBaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    5,402

    Default

    wtffffff and wat are my two favourite replies ever to threads

    to repeat myself: strictly speaking and based on ICM and stack sizes, it is a mistake for the bb to call a push here with less than AA(or possibly KK).

    as im short on time right now, i will attempt to explain my reasoning later and might even venture into some random number crunching to confuse u into thinking im correct
    For the best rakeback rates, greatest choice of poker rooms, more promotions, tournaments and bigger $$$ freerolls than any other rakeback affiliate, visit RakeTheRake, one of the largest and most reputable poker rakeback affiliates in the world.

    Get constant bonuses and superb customer support at RedKings. (Non-US only){its rigged for me but prob not u}

  10. #10
    PokerForums God DeeYakaBaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    5,402

    Default

    meh at number crunching not conclusively proving my point

    from the bb's point of view (putting us on any pair, any broadway and A7o+) it appears to be pretty much a breakeven call with JJ/AKs and a profitable call with QQ+.......obv numbers will vary depending on what range we can reasonably say that he puts us on.

    if there were slightly differing stack sizes, it turns into a whole new ball game so once more i will go out on a limb and say that my initial statement was not too far off being correct
    For the best rakeback rates, greatest choice of poker rooms, more promotions, tournaments and bigger $$$ freerolls than any other rakeback affiliate, visit RakeTheRake, one of the largest and most reputable poker rakeback affiliates in the world.

    Get constant bonuses and superb customer support at RedKings. (Non-US only){its rigged for me but prob not u}

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts