Welcome to PokerForums.org

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Stu Ungar OrionPro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,671

    Default Buyin amount for cash games?

    I wonder what's the optimal size to buy in while still fixing leaks. I'm trying to find an amount that allows somewhat speculative calls preflop (e.g. set-mining, suited connectors) but will minimize my errors with TPTK type hands. So a balance between the two.

    I experimented with 75bb and that seemed to work well.

    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Staff News Poster MJPerry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    London
    Posts
    5,300

    Default

    I don't think there's any point buying in short while fixing leaks if those leaks are at your 100BB game?

  3. #3
    Poker Professional ngaskin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,532

    Default

    I believe there are only two ways to do it, the full 100BB for deep stack strategy or 20BB for short stack strategy, anything in between is a waste of time imho
    Quote Originally Posted by tightagressive View Post
    so like, 1.5 years ago i'm at the casino w/ a friend. were playing the $600 max 1/2 sicko game that i always play and cruuushh for mirrions.

  4. #4
    piv
    piv is offline
    Stu Ungar piv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,740

    Default

    50bb works well, shalesy did/does it with success apparently, means you can't b/f the turn and puts you in some pretty high variance spot with top pair type hands, also awkward for 3betting pre.

    just stick with 100 since all the basic strat is based around it, certain lines you can't take with bigger/smaller stacks since you're planning the hand differently etc

  5. #5
    Super Moderator davidab157's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    7,663

    Default

    You'll have to learn to play 100bb stacks at some point so you may as well do it at the lower stakes.
    For Free Money, Rakeback and some 6x Ongame bonuses, I recommend PokerSource.

    I recommend Cardrunners for superb poker coaching. It was honestly the single biggest improvement in my game signing up there! Sign-up fee might seem steep, but it pays itself back within weeks.

  6. #6
    Mike McDermott
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    4,767

    Default

    You can't fix the leaks with any less than 100bb so if anything move down stakes

  7. #7
    Stu Ungar OrionPro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,671

    Default

    Well my goal is to make the most money in live or mid stakes games, sure I can 8-table NL25 on Stars with somewhat competent opponents 100+bb deep for learning purposes and make a small profit while I'm at it.

    But, say at a given table no fish has more than 80bb, why should I buy in full? My money is not coming from regs 200bb deep. I don't mind continuing with 160bb btw, so it's really just the initial buy in amount I'm thinking about.

  8. #8
    Super Moderator WotaWaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Luton, England
    Posts
    5,409

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OrionPro View Post
    But, say at a given table no fish has more than 80bb, why should I buy in full? My money is not coming from regs 200bb deep. I don't mind continuing with 160bb btw, so it's really just the initial buy in amount I'm thinking about.
    That's a different argument.
    However you may find even against regs who are better than you you have an ever lower EV when 75bb deep than when 100bb deep. I have tried this before at Nl2k games. I see 2 fish with $1000ish stacks and the rest of the tabel is solid regs with $2k+ so I buy in with $1k.

    However when a guy opens UTG, I cant really profitably call with say 77, and definitely cant play a hand like 45s even in a multiway pot. I have half the implied odds to play hands so end up playing tighter and as a result get into less pots with the fish. Even your cbets are less likely to work since people dont fear you, theyre not folding hands like 99/TT as an overpair where you may be able to get them in a tough spot if you carried the threat of 3 barrells to fire.

    If you want to totally nit it up and wait for AK/TT+ and check-fold AK unimproved I guess its good to have 50bb but that is unlikely to prove profitable anyway.
    Best Current Ongame Deal.
    Make sure to join Cash is King program for extra cashback as you clear the bonus.

    https://www.betsafe.com/poker/promot...nertag=4529086

  9. #9
    Stu Ungar OrionPro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,671

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WotaWaster View Post
    That's a different argument.
    However you may find even against regs who are better than you you have an ever lower EV when 75bb deep than when 100bb deep. I have tried this before at Nl2k games. I see 2 fish with $1000ish stacks and the rest of the tabel is solid regs with $2k+ so I buy in with $1k.

    However when a guy opens UTG, I cant really profitably call with say 77, and definitely cant play a hand like 45s even in a multiway pot. I have half the implied odds to play hands so end up playing tighter and as a result get into less pots with the fish. Even your cbets are less likely to work since people dont fear you, theyre not folding hands like 99/TT as an overpair where you may be able to get them in a tough spot if you carried the threat of 3 barrells to fire.

    If you want to totally nit it up and wait for AK/TT+ and check-fold AK unimproved I guess its good to have 50bb but that is unlikely to prove profitable anyway.
    thanks wota, good points.

  10. #10
    piv
    piv is offline
    Stu Ungar piv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,740

    Default

    dave pwned the thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts