Home
News
Articles
Site Reviews
Book Reviews
Interviews
Chat
Tournaments
60% Rakeback
50% RakebackNew!
125% Rakeback
Probabilities
Glossary
Poker Gear
Links
Advertise
User Name  
 
Password
Cookie?  
 
 
Poker Players on Launchpoker.com
LaunchPoker.com provides you with all the information you need about this year's WSOP event, from the 2008 WSOP schedule to the latest 2008 WSOP updates.
Every casino sited on our site is secure and reliable. Get ready to gamble big time!
Online poker reviews of rooms such as Full Tilt Poker, Poker Stars and Titan Poker.
RakeBack
Extras

RakeBack
PokerListings

Go Back PokerForums.org > Strategy Discussion > General Poker Strategy > Probably a stupid question.

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 ()  
Old 04-16-2008, 09:45 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 424
Trade Rating: (0)
Limits Played: $1-$2 NL
Send a message via AIM to Coleman
Default Probably a stupid question.

Ok....


This last weekend when PFO was down I went on a 2.5k downswing. I decided to cool my jets for awhile and play some NL50. Not so much to retune my game as after reviewing my HH's, I didn't really see any real troubles with my play but as to cool my jets before a total poker playing breakdown occured. Playing 40 hrs over the weekend and playing some live at the casino I got my roll back to where it was before the downswing.

During this time I noticed that I didn't lose one buy in at NL50, but through playing very patient and throughough play only went up at that particulaur stake. Now I'm not so great at multi tabling, I mean I play about 60 percent for income and 40 for the excitement of the game, thats mostly the reason I like to play higher limits as it catches my interest more than the micros.

Before this downswing I did very well playing nl400. Losing the occasional buy in to bad beats.

What my question is. Do I stay playing NL50 and work on my multi tabling or do I go back to NL400 now that my roll is healthy?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2 ()  
Old 04-16-2008, 11:49 PM
davidab157's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 6,169
Trade Rating: (1)
Limits Played: $0.50-$1 NL
Send a message via AIM to davidab157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coleman View Post
During this time I noticed that I didn't lose one buy in at NL50, but through running well only went up at that particulaur stake.
fyp

If you think you're playing well enough, play the higher stakes, your hourly from crushing 50nl won't compare to narrowly beating 400nl.
__________________
For Free Money, Poker Gifts and Rakeback I recommend PokerSourceOnline.

I have to recommend Cardrunners for superb poker coaching. It was honestly the single biggest improvement in my game signing up there! Sign-up fee might seem steep, but it pays itself back within weeks.
Reply With Quote
  #3 ()  
Old 04-17-2008, 10:28 PM
KRE8R's Avatar
NL20 Grinder...
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 6,733
Trade Rating: (3)
Limits Played: $0.10-$0.25 NL
Send a message via AIM to KRE8R
Default

It wouldnt hurt to spend some time getting used to multitabling though since you seem to play quite a bit online. Playing 2 or 3 tables of NL400 would be a huge boost to profits.
__________________
Lots of good rakeback options at http://www.raketherake.com/?refer=RTR25126

KRE8R probably has about seventy college funds in his NL5 roll.
Reply With Quote
  #4 ()  
Old 04-18-2008, 01:34 AM
WotaWaster's Avatar
Mike McDermott
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Luton, England
Posts: 4,525
Trade Rating: (6)
Limits Played: $2-$4 NL
Send a message via AIM to WotaWaster Send a message via MSN to WotaWaster Send a message via Yahoo to WotaWaster
Default

is Ub really this soft?

Do you play HU/6max or full rign?
__________________
For all non US Players I strongly recommend this site:
Red Kings: Plays on OnGame network, juicy games & continual bonuses given which clear at very good rate.
http://www.redkings.com/index.cgi?aname=jadegoody
Reply With Quote
  #5 ()  
Old 04-18-2008, 01:55 AM
Stu Ungar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 2,698
Trade Rating: (0)
Limits Played: $0.05-$0.10 NL
Send a message via AIM to MJPerry Send a message via MSN to MJPerry
Default

He plays 6-max.

UB is pretty soft but it's not worth depositing on. Crappy software and worse support.

If you can clear a bonus quickly it's probably worth you sticking a grand on there for the 111% bonus, Dave.
__________________
For poker, casino and sports betting news visit http://www.onlinecasinonews.com. They have a writer on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays who is immensely talented at everything he does.
Reply With Quote
  #6 ()  
Old 04-18-2008, 06:05 PM
KRE8R's Avatar
NL20 Grinder...
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 6,733
Trade Rating: (3)
Limits Played: $0.10-$0.25 NL
Send a message via AIM to KRE8R
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJPerry View Post
He plays 6-max.

UB is pretty soft but it's not worth depositing on. Crappy software and worse support.

If you can clear a bonus quickly it's probably worth you sticking a grand on there for the 111% bonus, Dave.
Actually they have good rakeback and the software has improved recently. As far as player quality I dont know.
__________________
Lots of good rakeback options at http://www.raketherake.com/?refer=RTR25126

KRE8R probably has about seventy college funds in his NL5 roll.
Reply With Quote
  #7 ()  
Old 04-19-2008, 02:26 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 424
Trade Rating: (0)
Limits Played: $1-$2 NL
Send a message via AIM to Coleman
Default A variation.

I play 6max of course. Alot of the time its just players (nl400) with about 30 to 50 bucks trying to turning nothing into something. Stealing pots is almost as easy as making love with MJperrys mom.

I dont know why people say their software is so bad, I have skins from TiltBuster.com to improve the look but as far as speed goes its the fastest site ive been on besides cake. There is no lag like you'll find on FTP or Stars.

Id say its definately worth depositing there.

1. Rake back is good.

2. Bad beat jackpot is always cool.

3. They treat there VIP's very well.

4. Withdraw's via Moneygram take about 24 hrs, sometimes not even, and only have a fee of 25 dollars. They also have BankWire, which takes about 5 days and have a 50 dollar fee. Numerous other options.

5. They actually have a phone number unlike FTP. Not to sure about stars.

6. They actually have deposit bonsuses unlike Stars.

All these reasons I still don't know why people drop money on stars or FTP without support phone numbers and it takes 5 days to get an email back for anything including withdrawls. (because they think its cool?)

The play is soft but sometimes it comes back to haunt you, and the highest I played was nl400 so I can't really say for anything above that, but know a few guys that play NL5000 that I could refer you to..

@Wota, you wouldnt have to deposit, I could send you what I have left on ub, which is about 1k and you could WU me the money? Just a thought. I give up online.

Went to the casino tonight and won around 700 playing NL400.
Reply With Quote
  #8 ()  
Old 04-19-2008, 02:45 AM
davidab157's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 6,169
Trade Rating: (1)
Limits Played: $0.50-$1 NL
Send a message via AIM to davidab157
Default

Software is actually not too bad, I quite like it. Put it this way it kicks the shit out of Ongame software.

Bad beat jackpot is gay at the low stakes cos the contribution wipes out your rakeback, but at 400nl or something it's not going to be as bad and I think there are more non-jackpot tables.

US donks are always +ev
__________________
For Free Money, Poker Gifts and Rakeback I recommend PokerSourceOnline.

I have to recommend Cardrunners for superb poker coaching. It was honestly the single biggest improvement in my game signing up there! Sign-up fee might seem steep, but it pays itself back within weeks.
Reply With Quote
  #9 ()  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:18 PM
Fish
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 39
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

Even at 400 the bad-beat jackpot has a pretty huge cost. Its the main reason I avoid UB.

OP the variance at NL50 (measured in buyins) will be much smaller cause their super weak tight. Its up to you if that worth the reduction in winrate. You could also try Nl200 or 100 as a happy middle ground.
Reply With Quote
  #10 ()  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:23 PM
Fish
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 39
Trade Rating: (0)
Default

Also if you think -2.5K is a big downswing at NL400 then I'm guessing you don't play a lot of hands. I wouldn't even call that a downswing, thats like 1 bad day for most regulars. If you play a couple hundred thousand hands the odds are high that you'll have a 5-10k downswing at some point so if your not ready for that of variance then sticking at a lower limit might be a good idea.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:53 PM.

   Designed by
      
No Deposit Bonus
Poker Strategy
Poker Rooms
Lucky Poker
Poker Forum
Poker en ligne
Pokerspiele
En ligne poker
Poker Rakeback
Poker italiano
Online Poker
Poker francais
Rakeback
Online Poker Strategy
PartyPoker Bonus Codes
CD Poker review
Poker Site USA
Full Tilt bonus code
   
   
Nowadays in the Internet the Players are looking for a good Casino Bonus to find the best possible options for online Roulette.There is now the option of RtlPoker and a nice Casino Bonus to play some other games then just Poker.
The ideal casino site for gokkasten and even online poker including online casino games that can be found on mijn online casino, your casino information site for when gambling online or even offline.
Party Poker bonus code & room review
Tony G talks about his experinces in his blog
REVIEW OF PARADISE POKER WEBSITE
Online Poker Room Directory and latest poker news
Best Online Poker info on Internet!
Ultimate Bet new 40% deposit bonus
Copyright © 2004-2008 PokerForums.org, a Merendi Networks Inc. project.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC5 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.