I know this is uber tight/nitty but I think it works at these levels and I'm getting okay results(despite the super variance). Obviously I have huge amounts of variance but I think that comes with the large AF. Anywho tell me what you think. And yes david I should steal more.

Very nitty, I don't think that's terrible but is fairly predictable. With figures that nitty I'd suggest your AF should be quite a lot higher and your W$WSF should be mid 40's. You are possibly calling/giving up too easily when you don't hit a flop well, giving up too easily when your cbets are called. Still it's kind of hard to say, because you've had a lot of swings, so your recent figures could easily be different than all those figures combined.

One way I found to free my mind of tight/weak tendancies a bit was to play quite a few sessions of 35/30 at a lower limit. Cbet everything, 3 bet flops a lot. It's amazing how often your opponents just fold when you gave absolutely no chance for him folding. But it trains your mind to think a lot more about the possibility a bet by the other player doesn't mean the nutz. More than anything shows you they can't see your cards, so their calling/raising you is most likely based on their hand strengths not yours. You start to think a lot more about what a player could be holding, and if you can get that down pat, you will find opening up your starting range will be quite easy to do.

Saying that I still like to play fairly nitty at these limits pre flop, but I don't want to easily give up on a flop if I can avoid it. You don't win money by playing tighter or looser, you win money by winning more pots than you are losing.

Your AF isn't that large tbh, I think most decent TAGs have one between 3 and 4.

Originally Posted by MJPerry

Your AF isn't that large tbh, I think most decent TAGs have one between 3 and 4.

Gimme a break, you read that somewhere...