What does the title have to do with the hand? Nothing of course, but Hendrix is the man.
Villian is a semi-decent player, in this game it means he knows the values of hands but thats about it^^
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.25 BB (9 handed) converter
MP1 ($14.45)
MP2 ($22.70)
MP3 ($13.15)
CO ($5.70)
Hero ($38.20)
SB ($9.15)
BB ($9.25)
UTG ($4.90)
UTG+1 ($49.65)
Preflop: Hero is Button with,
.
1 fold, UTG+1 raises to $1, 4 folds, Hero raises to $3, 2 folds, UTG+1 calls $2.
Flop: ($6.35),
,
(2 players)
UTG+1 bets $2, Hero raises to $6,
Comments?
I got to thinking of ways he could have me beat after I had raised. It didn't seem likely he'd bluff AK in this spot but thats the only hand I beat now that I think about it. I guess he must have made a weak call preflop then? Maybe 88-99? Anyways how's it look?
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
04-09-2005 #1
The traffic lights turn blue tomowrow(JJ hand)
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
04-09-2005 #2
If he re-raises you, you have to fold. All you can beat is 99 or 88 that I can fathom. Maybe, he has ATs and is just really bad, but I wouldn't think so. I would think that with AA-QQ, he re-raises PF, though. If he just calls, I have no problem with a check on the turn and checking or calling $10 or less on the river.
-
04-09-2005 #3
Rest of hand when I wake up.
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
04-10-2005 #4
this is pretty standard
btw why are you playing on starsit's better to be pissed off than pissed on
missot on stars. come to my poker vent server! (its a voice chat program)
-
04-10-2005 #5
-
04-10-2005 #6PokerForums God
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 8,204
U hate pokerstars? I agree, but why? I am only playing there because i enjoy the cheap tourney's right now.
-
04-11-2005 #7
I like Stars for SnG's and I love the gameplay and the software, but the fact of the matter is that it's blown up and they don't offer much to new players or, to be honest, broke players to lure the fish in. I was making good money on Stars, but I had to play 30-35 hours a weeks at 4-5 tables at a time to do it.
Party and UB have so many offers and benefits for players that you can make more money in half the time because of the players that are there. On Stars, you're not gonna hit a 4 or 5 handed 30/60 limit table with 2 fish. That's just the truth.
This trickles up and works its way up through the other games. .5/1 NLHE games on Stars are tougher than the 2/4 NLHE games on UB. The .25/.50 PLO games are tougher than the 1/2 PLO games on Party.
Their lack of customer appreciation is based on arrogance that stems from them having 2 WSOP champs that won their way in because of their abundance of satellites. They're making their money and I'm fine with that, but I go where the action is and it's not there.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
,
.
,
,
(2 players)
Reply With Quote



