Played a little of this at the 1/2 level at Paradise last night and think I might have found the proper outlet for my inner maniac. Either that or I was incredibly fortunate and found a table that had even less of a clue what it was doing than I did.
Either way, the profit spends the same
Seriously though, I have read the stuff in SS (do I have to start calling it SS1 now?) on draw and know some of the basics like mixing up your draws to disguise the true nature of your hand, basic opening and raising requirements based on position and other stuff. But I did find a recurring scenario last night that I want to ask about and get feedback on (yes, the answer might be buried in SS1 somewhere...I didn't go back and re-read last night after I finished playing)
When you hold a pair AND a four-to-a-straight or a four-to-a-flush -- say a hand like J-J-T-9-8 -- what are you looking at to determine whether to hold the pair and draw for trips/two pair vs. breaking up your pair and drawing to the straight/flush? Against one player I usually just draw to improve the pair whereas if it was a multi-way pot or if it was raised pre-flop then I'm almost always drawing for the straight/flush. But even this makes for a dicey situation when, for instance, I've raised on the button with K-K-x-x-x where four are of the same suit. The BB and the two limpers before me had all called the raise and then all three of them draw three, indicating that they started on pairs. What do folks do here...break what might have been the best pair to start things and draw to the flush (your draw of 1 represents a two-pair and gives you a chance to win via a bluff if its checked around to you as the raiser) or just draw three to the kings (gives you the chance to win the pot uncontested if its checked around to you...you can just check on the end if you don't improve to better than the kings).
It was a fun game...don't think I've finished a session at any other form of poker with a 62% raising rate for the session.