LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksPokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t150 (4 handed) converter
Button (t5493)
SB (t2507)
bonchkid (t3265)
UTG (t2235)
Preflop: bonchkid is BB with,
.
2 folds, SB raises to t450, bonchkid calls t300.
Flop: (t900),
,
(2 players)
SB bets t600, bonchkid raises to t1800, SB raises to t2057, bonchkid calls t257.
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 1 to 10 of 29
Thread: SNG bubble, OESD
-
03-28-2005 #1change my title babo
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Michigan
- Posts
- 6,953
SNG bubble, OESD
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
03-28-2005 #2Poker Expert
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Berkeley/Kansas
- Posts
- 1,386
Heh, semibluffing gone wrong. I wouldn't have called preflop, the value of your connector cards is pretty low right now and T9 isn't all that much better off than 76 or 56 right now
-
03-28-2005 #3PokerForums God
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- Nort Side o' Shi-kawgo
- Posts
- 7,959
I like the raise on the flop ONLY if there were no PF action. Otherwise, fold PF. Suited, I say call PF and fold the flop to protect your chips even though. Throw in the possibility of SB having QQ or JJ in the hole and you don't look too good here. Calling the flop commits the rest of his chips on the turn.
Originally Posted by FaDi
-
03-28-2005 #4PokerForums God
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 8,204
Well Mike, Bonchkid has one of this "interesting" hands, an unsuited connector - yes, and he decides to see a flop.
Yes Vince, "peach fuzz" got caught with his hand in the cookie jar there. To tell you the truth Vince I don't like this play on the bubble, no need to gamble with a hand like T9.
-
03-28-2005 #5Poker Expert
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Berkeley/Kansas
- Posts
- 1,386
LOL
-
03-28-2005 #6Banned
- Join Date
- Nov 2004
- Location
- Essex, UK
- Posts
- 2,389
I agree with Vince on this one.
-
03-28-2005 #7change my title babo
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Michigan
- Posts
- 6,953
How is T9 not better 76 or 65 on the flop?
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
03-28-2005 #8change my title babo
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Michigan
- Posts
- 6,953
He couldn't have TT-AA he ALWAYS calls those in the SB. Anyways he flipped over AK and I hit a straight on 4th.
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
03-28-2005 #9Banned
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 256
nice freaking catch
-
03-28-2005 #10PokerForums God
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- Nort Side o' Shi-kawgo
- Posts
- 7,959
But he plays 88, 33, AQ, AJ, KJ, maybe even JT the same way. Your biggest fears are JJ, 88, 33, and QQ. Folding equity is a good reason to raise and if I have him on no pair, I would make this call PF and make the semibluff on the flop. Originally Posted by bonchkid
Bonch didn't get lucky. He had 14 outs. If he hit a 9 or a T, Villian's re-draw is tight at only 6 outs. Bonch is actually about an 11:9 favorite in this spot.
I like that you trusted your observational read. I just might not play it this way, but if this is my read. I guess I am playing the hand this way in reality. Originally Posted by FaDi
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
