Welcome to PokerForums.org

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    Stu Ungar OrionPro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,671

    Default Mathematics of Poker by William Chen

    Has anyone read it? Just arrived yesterday. Looks like it takes a day to read a single page, quite involved...

    If noone has it I could write a short review in like... a year

  2. #2
    Super Moderator WotaWaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Luton, England
    Posts
    5,409

    Default

    I like Maths and even I couldn't finish it.

    Good Luck!
    Best Current Ongame Deal.
    Make sure to join Cash is King program for extra cashback as you clear the bonus.

    https://www.betsafe.com/poker/promot...nertag=4529086

  3. #3
    Poker Professional xxdemexx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,837

    Default

    hmmmm..maths
    See me playing $10/$20NL like it was play money

    http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?...405&q=xxdemexx

    Doberman: "but Sarge, isn't poker gambling and just luck?"
    Sgt. Bilko:" not the way I play it"

  4. #4
    Mike McDermott gder03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    playing with your mom
    Posts
    4,783

    Default

    even the guys on 2+2 said it was a difficult read.
    I get more ass than a toilet seat. All shapes/colors/sizes.

    caution:
    http://girlvideos.blogspot.com/

  5. #5
    Poker Hustler
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,157

    Default

    All the math I know is this :

    Ugly nerd that needs an extreme makeover + new teeth + has money = pays to get laid

    the rest is irrelevant

  6. #6
    Stu Ungar sk8freak_21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    PFO
    Posts
    2,048

    Default

    damn my brain hurts when i read Sklansky
    the two best MTT training sites on the net
    http://www.pokerpwnage.com/?ref=486
    http://www.pokerxfactor.com/

  7. #7
    Poker Expert poker player 100's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    united states
    Posts
    1,416

    Default

    seems too confusing to me

    im no good at math
    Poker

    NBA

  8. #8
    Mike McDermott gder03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    playing with your mom
    Posts
    4,783

    Default

    yeah, this will be 5x tougher then any sklansky book. I flipped through it @ B&N and it looked very tough.

    Nitty.

    I mean these guys basically explore every single possible thing you can.

    Like you will find 3 pages dedicated to exploring the effect of trying to get laid if you are really good at poker, and rich, but do not look good.

    Anyway, IMO this is a great read if you are very focused on the math. I mean I am guessing you wil understand what we are dealing w/ better after reading. Like there is alot of math beyond implied, reverse implied, and pot odds. This book explores it.

    But is it manditory? No.

    First you need to read TOP, and all the other good sklansky books.
    Then you read HOH (vol. 2 is best IMO).
    Then you read some other good books.

    Then you are ready for Bill Chen's book.

    Dont get me wrong; it is prolly a great read. But I am not sure I am ready for it. Nor do I feel I need to know some of thes maths he explores. But I do plan on reading it, b/c it looked very unique (not the same garbage all the poker books regurgitate over and over)
    I get more ass than a toilet seat. All shapes/colors/sizes.

    caution:
    http://girlvideos.blogspot.com/

  9. #9
    (Formerly Steve-O) Steve Ruddock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    5,966

    Default

    I found it boring as hell.

    Message to Mr. Chen: don't complicate simple concepts, leave that for Mr. Sklansky.

    Why the hell do we need 5 pages on calculating your chances of hitting a specific flop or being dealt a specific hand????????? They act as though we are doing 5 page proofs at the tables! Is anyone doing math equations before each deal to see what their chances of being dealt AA or 59 offsuit are?

    Isn't knowing I'm going to like the flop with 44 about 12% of the time good enough anymore? I don't need to figure out the chances of every possible flop. For christ sakes, poker is a complicated game to begin with, don't make it worse.

    This book is like micro-managing. if your company is losing $100,000 a year don't act like a savior because you figured out a way to save $1.20 a month by switching the paper clips you use.
    Read my musings on poker and life at Online Poker Examiner, Poker Examiner, PokerNewsBoy.com, and My Poker Blog

  10. #10
    Mike McDermott
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    4,767

    Default

    I've just started reading this book. I was wondering if there were any more opinions from people who have read it since this thread?

    It's pretty intense so far, they do like overdoing the details!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •