Here's a hand from last night I wanted to get some thoughts on - mostly on my river play.
Hand #4186685-6513 at Madras ($.25/$.50 Hold'em)
Powered by UltimateBet
Started at 03/Feb/05 22:37:40
jimiworm76 is at seat 0 with $10.85.
MICH is at seat 1 with $13.25.
3fish is at seat 2 with $5 (sitting out).
proxfan is at seat 3 with $3.85.
missandrst is at seat 4 with $8.20.
Girevik is at seat 5 with $14.70.
enjay is at seat 6 with $30.95.
Cover is at seat 7 with $24.75.
beavis68 is at seat 8 with $10.35.
Matty Bee is at seat 9 with $11.10.
The button is at seat 4.
Girevik posts the small blind of $.10.
enjay posts the big blind of $.25.
jimiworm76: -- --
MICH: -- --
proxfan: -- --
missandrst: -- --
Girevik: 6c 5c
enjay: -- --
Cover: -- --
beavis68: -- --
Matty Bee: -- --
Pre-flop:
Cover folds. beavis68 folds. Matty Bee folds.
jimiworm76 calls. MICH folds. proxfan calls.
missandrst folds. Girevik calls. enjay checks.
Flop (board: 7d 6d 9c):
Girevik bets $.25. enjay folds. jimiworm76 calls.
proxfan folds.
Turn (board: 7d 6d 9c 2c):
Girevik bets $.50. jimiworm76 calls.
River (board: 7d 6d 9c 2c 8c):
Girevik bets $.50. jimiworm76 raises to $1. Girevik
re-raises to $1.50. jimiworm76 re-raises to $2.
Girevik calls.
Showdown:
jimiworm76 shows Tc Jc.
jimiworm76 has Tc Jc 9c 2c 8c: flush, jack high.
Girevik mucks cards.
(Girevik has 6c 5c.)
Hand #4186685-6513 Summary:
$.30 is raked from a pot of $6.50.
jimiworm76 wins $6.20 with flush, jack high.
Basically I was thinking that if he had the flush I was probably beat, but given the fact that he'd need two clubs, and I knew were 5 of the 13 were, I figured the odds of him having them were slim - with a board of 6,7,8,9 I thought a straight was more likely. When he re-raised to cap it I figured I was dead, but I was getting 12-1 pot odds and couldn't seen folding there just in case he WOULD cap with a straight.
Should I have just called his raise and let it go at 2 bets?
Why couldn't that damn 7 have been the 7c and given the straight flush? That would have been my best hand of all time.
BTW - what's that hand converter everyone is using? I don't have that link.
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 1 to 10 of 22
Thread: Thoughts on this hand
-
February 4th, 2005 #1
Thoughts on this hand
-
February 4th, 2005 #2
simple check call on the river, you are either beat or he will not call your bet.
good example of when only a better hand will call, y
ou are willing to put in 1 more bet but he is only going to call or raise you with a hand that can beat you. instead use that 1 extra bet to call with, this way you will induce him to bluff when he doesn't have you beat (winning a bet that betting out doesn't get you) and you only lose 1 bet instead of 2 or more when you are beat.Read my musings on poker and life at PokerNewsBoy.com, and My Poker Blog
"Galfond is a mind reading wizard & we should consider burning him at the stake. " Hockey Guy
-
February 4th, 2005 #3
I don't know about that - I'd have to think he would deffinately have called, and maybe raised, with the straight - even with 3 to the flush on the board.
Originally Posted by Steve-O
-
February 4th, 2005 #4
exactly! he calls or raises when he has you beat and folds if he doesn't. Do you think he will call with a pair with that board?
Read my musings on poker and life at PokerNewsBoy.com, and My Poker Blog
"Galfond is a mind reading wizard & we should consider burning him at the stake. " Hockey Guy
-
February 4th, 2005 #5
I'm sorry i didn't see it was a flush on the river I thought you both had straights.
A main reason I hate when people post hand histories, instead of typing out a summary.Read my musings on poker and life at PokerNewsBoy.com, and My Poker Blog
"Galfond is a mind reading wizard & we should consider burning him at the stake. " Hockey Guy
-
February 4th, 2005 #6
Ignore what i said above, however if it wasn't a club on the river my advice was spot on!!! lol
Read my musings on poker and life at PokerNewsBoy.com, and My Poker Blog
"Galfond is a mind reading wizard & we should consider burning him at the stake. " Hockey Guy
-
February 4th, 2005 #7Daniel Negreanu
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 8,204
- PFO Points
- 8204
I thought you were going nuts steve-o.
This is a tough one Gir. People are so flush shy, it may have been better to just call the raise.
Gir went on a tear after this and won 3 8BB pots in a row.
The only pot I won all night was a bluff from the BB with 74o.
-
February 4th, 2005 #8
Well, in hindsight I KNOW it would have been better!
Originally Posted by Beavis68

I guess I just got caught up in the "what are the odds he has two of the 8 clubs left in the deck?" thinking.
-
February 4th, 2005 #9Daniel Negreanu
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 8,204
- PFO Points
- 8204
Well, the odds get a lot better when you are raised and capped.
Originally Posted by Girevik
-
February 4th, 2005 #10
Yeah - when he capped I was pretty sure I was beat, but I had 12-1 odds. I had to take the shot just in case he would cap with the top straight.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote