Hi,
Was just wondering what your strategy is when you are dealt a low pocket pair? (|
![]()
| etc ). I believe if you play it through you have a 20% chance of catching your set.
My old style, i used to play this hand extremely aggressively, betting preflop to eliminate limpers, and then betting again on the flop regardless of what comes up. I have found this to be effective at times:
- Preflop bet makes others think i have a strong hand (AK, AQ, etc) And another bet on the flop will sometimes scare them off. Furthermore, if there is anyone who calls, and i happen to catch the trips, then i have them trapped.
On the other hand however, i find this play to be devastating when either your opponent catches any decent hand and you do not catch your trips - so i dont think this is the best way to play it.
What do you think?
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 1 to 10 of 23
Thread: Low pocket pairs - what to do?
-
01-29-2005 #1Fish Food
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 3
Low pocket pairs - what to do?
-
01-29-2005 #2
If you don't know what to do you shouldn't play the hand at all. A lot of "Pro's" suggest not playing any pair below 5s in ring games.
Read my musings on poker and life at Online Poker Examiner, Poker Examiner, PokerNewsBoy.com, and My Poker Blog
-
01-29-2005 #3PokerForums God
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 8,204
it is called "set it or forget it"
If you can limp in in late position, fine, but if you don't hit a set on the flop, do not call any more bets (unless you have some straight draw too)
-
01-29-2005 #4
In a lot of tables, its worth a limp from any position.
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
01-29-2005 #5PokerForums God
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 8,204
they are unprofitable short handed, especially if you get stuck calling a raise.
-
01-29-2005 #6
Agreed, but in most tables, the more loose-passive the better, they are worth limping from most positions.
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
01-29-2005 #7
Bonch, I sorta agree.
But a new or even intermediate player will lose money with 22-44 from anywhere but the cut off or the button.
I've also seen stats of winning players who have a -EV with these hands from anywhere but the blinds.
in regards to limit of course!!!Read my musings on poker and life at Online Poker Examiner, Poker Examiner, PokerNewsBoy.com, and My Poker Blog
-
01-29-2005 #8PokerForums God
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Posts
- 8,204
yep - agreed.
I think it is better to have a few limping into the pot than expect that more will limp behind you - everytime they don't it is a -EV play.
In NL, you can call a small raise if you both have good stack. Classic hand is AK vs 44 or 55 and the flop is A 5 4 or something. You can usually get all of the AKs chips.
-
01-29-2005 #9Fish Food
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 3
Thanks for the input. In a head to head match, its a whole different story. I believe the odds are almost even (the pocket pair has a slight advantage) correct?
-
01-29-2005 #10
Uh, vs 2 overcards you're at a slight advantage preflop, but its tough to play postflop.
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
|
| etc ). I believe if you play it through you have a 20% chance of catching your set.
Reply With Quote