QTs out of the blind - Page 2

the alex · #11 (**permalink**) 06-07-2006, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marm

Alex, thats VPIP not Flop Entry. Means he's voluntarily put money in 23% when he had the choice. Meaning, an unraised pot in the BB doesn't count towards this. This type of VPIP probably is in the 40%-45% FE at these tables. So excluding the BB, he's trying to see a flop at least once a round, and raising half of those.

I know that, but it's a way to cross reference to see how the basic numbers change. He's only playing 3 hands per 2 orbits voluntarily and he's semi-loose? In full ring this is a 15%. Pretty tight, huh?

the alex · #12 (**permalink**) 06-07-2006, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve-O

Did he get you with AT?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pok 7's

Don't know how you called that one.

You wouldn't have posted it.

That's why I brought up the flaws in the generalizations that you're using.

Marm · #13 (**permalink**) 06-07-2006, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the alex

I know that, but it's a way to cross reference to see how the basic numbers change. He's only playing 3 hands per 2 orbits voluntarily and he's semi-loose? In full ring this is a 15%. Pretty tight, huh?

I am not arguing whether he is tight or not, I have not studied 6 max enough to say. Just that I thought you were misunderstanding the numbers.

the alex · #14 (**permalink**) 06-07-2006, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marm

I am not arguing whether he is tight or not, I have not studied 6 max enough to say. Just that I thought you were misunderstanding the numbers.

I know that I wasn't very clear. That why I clarified.

Pok 7's · #15 (**permalink**) 06-07-2006, 09:51 PM

Okay back to the hand

So basically calling this raise was a mistake.

Post flop was I over aggressive?

the alex · #16 (**permalink**) 06-07-2006, 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pok 7's

Okay back to the hand

So basically calling this raise was a mistake.

Post flop was I over aggressive?

Re-read the thread.