LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksI started w/$10 last week brought it up to $88 in a week.Now im playing .1/.25 nl holdem until i bring it up to $200, then start playing .25/.5. I just seem to win when the pressure is on half my bankroll.(btw i dont play with my whole bankroll at one table, that just seems stupid to me)
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 1 to 10 of 12
-
05-22-2006 #1Mike McDermott
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Location
- Brunson, Amarillo, Crandall? Do I need to say more.
- Posts
- 3,429
This isn't very good strategy bankroll wise, but i've been doing it and winning.
-
05-22-2006 #2Mike McDermott
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Michigan
- Posts
- 3,439
if only it was that easy
-
05-22-2006 #3Mike McDermott
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Southington, CT
- Posts
- 3,334
it just forces you to play smart... just pretend its for all your money and play the proper limits as solidly and you wont have to worry about going broke
-
05-23-2006 #4PokerForums God
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Cleveland
- Posts
- 9,757
I'll just get it over with now.
*SWIFT KICK IN THE NUTS*Marm is back, maybe. Been off for 3 years. Rusty as Hell.
Luck is a Residue of Design.
-
05-23-2006 #5PokerForums God
- Join Date
- Oct 2004
- Location
- Cleveland
- Posts
- 9,757
This is getting a nomination for most profound statement.
Originally Posted by Bagonirix
Marm is back, maybe. Been off for 3 years. Rusty as Hell.
Luck is a Residue of Design.
-
05-23-2006 #6PokerForums God
- Join Date
- Sep 2004
- Location
- Nort Side o' Shi-kawgo
- Posts
- 7,959
No matter how smart you play, numbers don't lie, they just catch up with you as the low margin of error proves itself. You're giving yourself no margin of consequence, let alone error. You have $88. Play $10 games. You're gonna lose it all and it'll happen over the span of a couple of days. I'll guarantee it.
Originally Posted by FaDi
-
05-23-2006 #7River Rat
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 406
I started with $50 and played Nl10 to start off with and never went broke.
I think at low limits BR management is less crucial because the players are soooo bad.I wanna live till I die. No more. No less.
-
05-23-2006 #8Mike McDermott
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Michigan
- Posts
- 3,439
actually, this would be more crucial, because you get more marginal calls, thus more varience. Originally Posted by flowingriver
however what you did is not hard. you had 5 buyins to an easy game, assuming you are a good player, once you hit 10 buyins you are almost home free.
-
05-23-2006 #9NL20 Grinder...
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Portland, OR
- Posts
- 8,869
Originally Posted by tightagressive
If this is the case then why is 25 the standard for SS NL? I seem to hear varying opinions on this.Lots of good rakeback options at http://www.rakeguard.com/?raf=KRE8R
KRE8R probably has about seventy college funds in his NL5 roll.
-
05-24-2006 #10Mike McDermott
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Michigan
- Posts
- 3,439
dont really know, ive just heard 10 is the minimum. Originally Posted by KRE8R
ive been doing well shortstacking recently, when i do that i have 20 buyins of my bankroll and i 4 table and make a nice profit.
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
