Yeah, loose-aggressive is the Doyle Brunson style. Super System 2 No Limit Hold em section explain it particulary well.

But you got to understand perfectly his style otherwise you will simply lose your whole stack missing your bluffs.

I would descibe Brunson's method as tight-aggressive rather than loose-aggressive.

Originally Posted by Girevik

I would descibe Brunson's method as tight-aggressive rather than loose-aggressive.

??

Did you read super system ?
He s the biggest bullier ever.

Yeah, that's the aggressive part. He reccomends playing solid starting cards; that's the tight part.

Originally Posted by Nightshades

If I win ten pots where nobody has a big hands, ten pots with lets say $3000 in them, I can afford to take 2 to 1 the worst of it and play a $30 000 pot. I've already have that pot covered thanks to all the small pots I've picked up. [...] I would say that when the money goes in, I've got the worst hand over 50% of the time. Obviously i wouldn't be able to overcome that statistic if I didn't always pad my stack by picking up all those small pot throughout the game

Could it be more loose ??

brunson is TAG.
i don think there are any bookks on LAG b/c it is much more difficult. basically you raise any un opened pot from decent position. and when out of position in a raised pot, you double barell alot as apposed to bet flop check turn.

I dont understand though

How can Brunson be into the pot in most of the small pot if he s playing tight ?