At which point do you limp in rather than betting/raising?
I know you can raise with TT but what about 99, 88 and 77?
EDIT: I forgot to mention early in a tourney, sameish stack sizes
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 1 to 10 of 30
-
05-10-2006 #1
Which pocket pairs are too low to bet pf
Last edited by OrionPro; 05-10-2006 at 09:58 AM.
-
05-10-2006 #2
depends on position and the action before me. I'd raise with about any of those if I was the first one into the pot, especially if I was in mid position or better. With limpers already in the pot I may well just limp with TT.
I'm CDO. It's like OCD, but everying is in order just like it should be.
-
05-10-2006 #3
and # of players at the table, and blind structure if its a tournament.
Originally Posted by Girevik
early in a sng i will mostly play pocket pairs for set value, aside from AA, KK, and QQ. maybe jacks or 10's in very late position. later in a sng when the blinds are worth snagging, i will raise 88+ with position. if i am in pushing territory i am happy to push any pp to hope to steal the blinds/double up via a coin flip.
unless its short handed or im short stacked, i will not re raise unless i hold AA, KK, and QQ. (sometimes i might just call with qq)
in ep in any game i usually dump the lowest pairs, unless the game is very loose passive then i will play any pair for set value. basically, if its cheap and the players are bad, i want to get in with a pocket pair and double my chips. in most ring games i raise TT+ with decent position. at 6max tables ill raise with a few more pairs. especaily if im pretty sure these players will let me take alot of pots on the flop. if its been loose agressive i usually play for a set.
if there is a pf raise and i have a low pair, i have to think about a few things. first off, where am i playing. will this player/these players overcommit with top pair when i flop a set? do they have AA (i want to call if they have AA, that way i almost certainly double my chips) will there be a re raise behind me? there is a pf raise with 3 callers, i would love to come along with 77, unless there is a raise behind me. then i have to fold.
-
05-10-2006 #4
Limp and try to catch a set with most pocket pairs.
.... what tightaggressive said."In the beginning... everthing was even money"Mike Caro
-
05-10-2006 #5
Here's What Works For Me:
I raise 98% of the time when first in with AA, KK, QQ or JJ. I limp from early position with TT and fold to any serious raises. I fold 99 or less from early position 98% of the time.
From the middle, I raise AA - 88 when first in. Otherwise I simply call with these hands. I occasionally call raises with 77 but usually fold all other pairs to a 4XBB raise or larger. I will limp from middle with any pair, but fold all but 88 or better to a decent raise behind me.
From late position I will raise AA-66 when first in and raise all other pairs about 50% of the time. If I don't raise, I will limp any of the pairs 22 - 55. If first in on the button, I will always raise any pair...I never limp first in on the button.
I will RR about 50% of the time w/ AA - QQ and occasionally with JJ or TT depending on position, players, etc.
With small pairs, 22 - 66, I fold to any bet after the flop if I did not hit my set and there are overcards. Keep in mind that I limped w/ these small hands, so even if I am an overpair, I have to worry about the blinds hitting a low straight.
I might stick around with KK-88 as second pair IF I have reason to believe they are good...but I do not like to gamble a lot if there are overcards on the board.
Interestingly, my stats show me with a positive earn rate or very near break even on all pairs except 99 and 88. These are the two that get me in trouble. I used to play them similar to TT from early position, but I have stopped. I have about 7000 hands in database, so I have had each pair about 25-35 times. Not a huge database, but informative nonetheless.
CORYAN
BTW, QQ is showing my best earnings...almost double what I have made with the second place AA.
-
05-10-2006 #6
I'm a habitual limper with AA utg. Very dangerous, but I'm addicted.
MTTs I raise QQ, limp JJ and fold TT to a raise. Unless I don't for any number of reasons.
-
05-10-2006 #7
With AA,KK,QQ I flat call UTG and re-raise if its raised by mid or late position
"In the beginning... everthing was even money"Mike Caro
-
05-10-2006 #8
You limp-raisers from UTG are risking a bit if playing at the low limits. I have seen all sorts of junk call these reraises. The other day there was a limp from UTG, 4XBB raise from MP1 and four callers...UTG RRed 5X the orginal raise and FOUR of the five CALLED his RR. If I have AA, the last thing I want is four callers! I know this is unusual, but it is not unusual for 4-5 more to limp in when UTG limps.
Hey, when I get RRed by the UTG limper, I will only call with my pocket pairs and hope to bust your aces (did it once w/ TT...felt so good).
That said....I did limp/RR my AA once and more than doubled my stack! hehe
BTW, the AA still held up in the first scenario.
CORYAN
-
05-11-2006 #9
TT+ raise from any position.
22-99 limp in and play for set value.
88 and 99 raise if u have position.
QQ+ re-raise pf.
-
05-11-2006 #10
Thanks all!
what means "having position" btw?
I saw that in HoH and wasn't really sure what position exactly he meant.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
