|

05-10-2006, 10:54 AM
|
 |
Stu Ungar
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,672
Limits Played: $1-$2 NL
|
|
Which pocket pairs are too low to bet pf
At which point do you limp in rather than betting/raising?
I know you can raise with TT but what about 99, 88 and 77?
EDIT: I forgot to mention early in a tourney, sameish stack sizes
Last edited by OrionPro; 05-10-2006 at 10:58 AM.
|
| Sponsored Links |
|

05-10-2006, 10:56 AM
|
 |
Poker Professional
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,732
|
|
depends on position and the action before me. I'd raise with about any of those if I was the first one into the pot, especially if I was in mid position or better. With limpers already in the pot I may well just limp with TT.
__________________
I'm CDO. It's like OCD, but everying is in order just like it should be.
|

05-10-2006, 11:12 AM
|
 |
Mike McDermott
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,258
Limits Played: Play Money
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Girevik
depends on position and the action before me.
|
and # of players at the table, and blind structure if its a tournament.
early in a sng i will mostly play pocket pairs for set value, aside from AA, KK, and QQ. maybe jacks or 10's in very late position. later in a sng when the blinds are worth snagging, i will raise 88+ with position. if i am in pushing territory i am happy to push any pp to hope to steal the blinds/double up via a coin flip.
unless its short handed or im short stacked, i will not re raise unless i hold AA, KK, and QQ. (sometimes i might just call with qq)
in ep in any game i usually dump the lowest pairs, unless the game is very loose passive then i will play any pair for set value. basically, if its cheap and the players are bad, i want to get in with a pocket pair and double my chips. in most ring games i raise TT+ with decent position. at 6max tables ill raise with a few more pairs. especaily if im pretty sure these players will let me take alot of pots on the flop. if its been loose agressive i usually play for a set.
if there is a pf raise and i have a low pair, i have to think about a few things. first off, where am i playing. will this player/these players overcommit with top pair when i flop a set? do they have AA (i want to call if they have AA, that way i almost certainly double my chips) will there be a re raise behind me? there is a pf raise with 3 callers, i would love to come along with 77, unless there is a raise behind me. then i have to fold.
|

05-10-2006, 11:43 AM
|
 |
Chaser
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 181
|
|
Limp and try to catch a set with most pocket pairs.
.... what tightaggressive said.
__________________
"In the beginning... everthing was even money" Mike Caro
|

05-10-2006, 02:25 PM
|
 |
Chaser
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 142
|
|
Here's What Works For Me:
I raise 98% of the time when first in with AA, KK, QQ or JJ. I limp from early position with TT and fold to any serious raises. I fold 99 or less from early position 98% of the time.
From the middle, I raise AA - 88 when first in. Otherwise I simply call with these hands. I occasionally call raises with 77 but usually fold all other pairs to a 4XBB raise or larger. I will limp from middle with any pair, but fold all but 88 or better to a decent raise behind me.
From late position I will raise AA-66 when first in and raise all other pairs about 50% of the time. If I don't raise, I will limp any of the pairs 22 - 55. If first in on the button, I will always raise any pair...I never limp first in on the button.
I will RR about 50% of the time w/ AA - QQ and occasionally with JJ or TT depending on position, players, etc.
With small pairs, 22 - 66, I fold to any bet after the flop if I did not hit my set and there are overcards. Keep in mind that I limped w/ these small hands, so even if I am an overpair, I have to worry about the blinds hitting a low straight.
I might stick around with KK-88 as second pair IF I have reason to believe they are good...but I do not like to gamble a lot if there are overcards on the board.
Interestingly, my stats show me with a positive earn rate or very near break even on all pairs except 99 and 88. These are the two that get me in trouble. I used to play them similar to TT from early position, but I have stopped. I have about 7000 hands in database, so I have had each pair about 25-35 times. Not a huge database, but informative nonetheless.
CORYAN
BTW, QQ is showing my best earnings...almost double what I have made with the second place AA.
|

05-10-2006, 02:28 PM
|
 |
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 2,389
|
|
I'm a habitual limper with AA utg. Very dangerous, but I'm addicted.
MTTs I raise QQ, limp JJ and fold TT to a raise. Unless I don't for any number of reasons.
|

05-10-2006, 02:28 PM
|
 |
Chaser
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 181
|
|
With AA,KK,QQ I flat call UTG and re-raise if its raised by mid or late position
__________________
"In the beginning... everthing was even money" Mike Caro
|

05-10-2006, 03:35 PM
|
 |
Chaser
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 142
|
|
You limp-raisers from UTG are risking a bit if playing at the low limits. I have seen all sorts of junk call these reraises. The other day there was a limp from UTG, 4XBB raise from MP1 and four callers...UTG RRed 5X the orginal raise and FOUR of the five CALLED his RR. If I have AA, the last thing I want is four callers! I know this is unusual, but it is not unusual for 4-5 more to limp in when UTG limps.
Hey, when I get RRed by the UTG limper, I will only call with my pocket pairs and hope to bust your aces (did it once w/ TT...felt so good).
That said....I did limp/RR my AA once and more than doubled my stack! hehe
BTW, the AA still held up in the first scenario.
CORYAN
|

05-11-2006, 01:15 AM
|
 |
Poker Professional
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,615
|
|
TT+ raise from any position.
22-99 limp in and play for set value.
88 and 99 raise if u have position.
QQ+ re-raise pf.
|

05-11-2006, 05:32 AM
|
 |
Stu Ungar
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,672
Limits Played: $1-$2 NL
|
|
Thanks all!
what means "having position" btw?
I saw that in HoH and wasn't really sure what position exactly he meant.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:10 AM.
|
 |
|