Welcome to PokerForums.org

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Stu Ungar Mr.McJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    2,403

    Default PF pot odds for small pairs?

    In NL cash games, what kind of odds do you need to call a PF raise with a small pocket pair? I keep finding myself in situations where I limp from MP with a small pair (let's say 4s) after a couple of other people have limped from EP. Then someone from LP raises it up to something like 5bb, a couple other people call and it comes to me.

    Generally speaking, should I call? Or more specifically, what are the minimum PF odds you would need to make this call?

  2. #2
    Poker Hustler Jason75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,230

    Default

    Ok, there's a difference between direct odds and implied odds.

    Direct odds are very simple. What you have to call vs. what is actually in the pot. That's it. So if it's 300 more to you and there's 1500 in the pot, you're getting 5:1 on your money.

    Implied odds are what you think you can get if you hit your hand. So if it's 300 to call a 900 pot (3:1 direct odds), but you have 4000 and your opponent has 3600, your odds are:

    3 (direct) + 12 (3600/300 - always go with the lesser amount of stacks) = 15:1

    To hit your set (my favorite play), you need about 7.5:1 to break even. So I would call anytime your total odds are 9 or 10:1 or better. In position, I will often call just getting 8:1.

  3. #3
    Check Raiser Fishodeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    723

    Default

    I will sometimes call with less than 8:1 in cash games because ppls stacks are usually pretty high compared to the blinds. In your example you need to call 4bb to look at a pot of about 22bb, but ppl usually sit in with at least 50bb and sometimes 200bb. Of course at the low limits I play, its very likely you'll stack someone if you hit a set.

  4. #4
    Stu Ungar Mr.McJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    2,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fishodeath
    I will sometimes call with less than 8:1 in cash games because ppls stacks are usually pretty high compared to the blinds. In your example you need to call 4bb to look at a pot of about 22bb, but ppl usually sit in with at least 50bb and sometimes 200bb. Of course at the low limits I play, its very likely you'll stack someone if you hit a set.
    See, that's exactly why I asked this question. In a tournament, I'm laying this down 99% of the time but in a ring game it SEEMS to be +EV in the long run since it usually takes down a large pot when you catch your set.

  5. #5
    PokerForums God Marm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cleveland
    Posts
    9,757

    Default

    IN the micro games, these are a hand that I always limp with. Cause if you hit, you will definatly get paid your implied odds.

    Implied odds with sets are easy. You are getting 4-1 right now, But you can count on at least 2 more small bets and a big bet later on if you hit, but you are folding if you miss, so there is no more incurred cost of playing small pairs. The problems start arising when you are raised or are facing a raise, Then you have to pay 2 small bets. Most of the time you can't count on seeing 16 more small bets enter a pot to make it worht your while.
    Marm is back, maybe. Been off for 3 years. Rusty as Hell.

    Luck is a Residue of Design.

  6. #6
    River Rat
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    329

    Default

    Yeah at low limits, i call/limp with them for any reasonable raise, becuase implied odds here are usually great and there is a good chance you can stack someone if you hit.

  7. #7
    Poker Hustler Jason75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,230

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.McJ
    See, that's exactly why I asked this question. In a tournament, I'm laying this down 99% of the time but in a ring game it SEEMS to be +EV in the long run since it usually takes down a large pot when you catch your set.
    I think laying this hand down in a tournament is a mistake if you're getting your odds.

    I often call raises in position or even in the blinds with any pair as long as I am getting my odds. That being said, I'm very good at extracting every last penny when I hit, so I can run it a little closer to the edge.

    You'll want to inflate your odds a little, get at least 10:1 until you feel more comfortable playing the set.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •