LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksPokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.25 BB (9 handed) converter
MP2 ($24.60)
MP3 ($19.45)
CO ($23.65)
Button ($23.35)
SB ($20.05)
BB ($8.75)
Hero ($30.20)
UTG+1 ($25.15)
MP1 ($15.85)
Preflop: Hero is UTG with,
.
Hero raises to $1, 3 folds, MP3 raises to $3.75, 4 folds, Hero folds.
Final Pot: $5.10
He showed KK
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 1 to 10 of 22
Thread: Too tight or good laydown?
-
03-14-2006 #1Poker Expert
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Long Island, NY
- Posts
- 1,310
Too tight or good laydown?
-
03-14-2006 #2change my title babo
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Michigan
- Posts
- 6,953
yes
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
03-14-2006 #3Poker Expert
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Long Island, NY
- Posts
- 1,310
Funny Bonch.....villain was only playing about 14% (Poker Tracker) of hands and not raising when he came in to a pot. So knowing this do you lay it down also?
-
03-14-2006 #4River Rat
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- new joisy
- Posts
- 281
I don't like raising UTG with Queens. QQ to me, is just as bad as 99. I'd limp in from that position.
nice laydown though.part time poker player, full time money maker
-
03-14-2006 #5Stu Ungar
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Toronto, Ontario
- Posts
- 2,403
I had the exact same thread here....
http://pokerforums.org/showthread.php?t=9905
-
03-14-2006 #6River Rat
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- new joisy
- Posts
- 281
Originally Posted by Mr.McJ
not exactly. you were not utg. AND.......utg, utg+1 both limped making your hand quite different.
good fold on your part though too.
part time poker player, full time money maker
-
03-14-2006 #7change my title babo
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Michigan
- Posts
- 6,953
Oh you decided to give us actual information this time? Well that's a good start. You need to include this with your OP. Originally Posted by Antneye
“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
03-14-2006 #8change my title babo
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Location
- Michigan
- Posts
- 6,953
Funny joke. Originally Posted by scottieboy
99 should be raised too.“There's no sense in being precise when you don't even know what you're talking about.” - John von Neumann
-
03-14-2006 #9Stu Ungar
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- Toronto, Ontario
- Posts
- 2,403
Touche. Originally Posted by scottieboy
not exactly. you were not utg. AND.......utg, utg+1 both limped making your hand quite different.
good fold on your part though too.
And Bonch, you would raise 99 UTG?
-
03-14-2006 #10Poker Expert
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- Long Island, NY
- Posts
- 1,310
Interesting Scottie. So you are playing your Queens like a mid Google Page Ranking. I think that me be too passive. I am most likely getting called by 1 or 2 people here (or may be taking the pot down right now) and may be able to outplay them post flop if an A or K hits the board. If I am re-raised...it depends on my read and the amt of the re-raise. Here I felt strongly that I was behind and got away from it, but against another opponent i may have called.
The reason I posted was because I was wondering if a call was technically still the correct play.
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
