Due to a change in my available playing times (less time per session available to me) I have been migrating over to mostly ring play. For the most part I have been profitable when playing ring, but I am trying to improve my game (as we all are).
I typically play a tight aggressive game, but in tourneys you need to need to take chances to double up and grab the prize. I am running into spots where I have pushed the edge and lost a chunk of my money and am wondering whether I need to walk away from these spots in ring play.
Anybody want to share the difference in their game when playing ring vs tourney? I am talking strictly NL Holdem here.
Welcome to PokerForums.org
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Results 1 to 9 of 9
-
03-06-2006 #1
making the transition from tourney to ring
-
03-06-2006 #2
I'm certainly not an expert so take what I say with a grain of salt. Also note that I play the lowest limit available at pokerroom ($0.25,) so my advice may not apply to larger limits or, perhaps, to the $0.25 limits available at other sites.
Originally Posted by Antneye
Since the blinds aren't increasing and there is no need to build a stack to stay alive, patience is the key in ring games. You're better off just waiting for the big hands and playing them REALLY agressively. Once you pick up a good hand, bet big PF. A lot of people in ring games (at least the ones I play in) are willing to gamble. They have no problem calling 4bb raises with 10/J OS so betting 8-12bbs will either make them fold, and help you to avoid those horrible bad beats that seem to come at the micro limits, or punish them when they still call but miss the flop.
Avoid the trouble hands (AJ, KQ, KJ, etc.) Unless you're good enough to make solid reads post flop and lay down top pair, good kicker, you're better off just avoiding these situations altogether. The only exception to this is when I have position and can see a cheap flop. Then I'll be more likely to limp in and hope to catch 2 pair or better. I'll also due the same with small suited connectors and small to medium pairs.
This isn't a really exciting way to play poker and you'll find that it can be quite tedious grinding out small pots, but it's a good way to consistently make money in the ring games and help you get more comfortable playing them. Once you've built up some experience, you can open up your play and get more creative.Last edited by Mr.McJ; 03-06-2006 at 11:41 AM.
-
03-06-2006 #3
To add to that....
Keep it simple. If you limp in with a suited connector and don't flop to it, check/fold. There is no point in getting fancy when you haven't invested a lot money into the pot and there isn't much in there to begin with. Again, you're not trying to build a stack to survive so there is no need to fight for pots that aren't worth it. Assuming you're playing the lower limits, you have to remember who your opponents are. Most of the time you'll be playing against an opponent who doesn't really realise when he should fold and so when you make a huge check-raise bluff against his top pair/weak kicker, instead of folding like a pro might, he's going to call you.
I understand that in a tournament, playing such simple, straight forward poker is going to result in you being busted out early but in low limit ring games against opponents who are coming and going (and who are generally too slow to catch on to what you are doing and adjust their style accordingly,) it's the easiest way to consistently make money.
-
03-06-2006 #4
sounds like you may be getting involved in situations where you have 50bb in the pot preflop with AQ agaiunst a dude that you have put all in? Or maybe substitute the AQ with 88?
imo cash is about taking down pots @ the right time.I get more ass than a toilet seat. All shapes/colors/sizes.

caution:
http://girlvideos.blogspot.com/
-
03-06-2006 #5
Ant, you know how to play, so I'm not goign to even bother giving strategy as to what to play when.
Basically the idea of a tournament is to give and take Edges when you need to build or keep your stack. You will fold a situation that might be marginally +EV if it risks a good chunk of your stack, but then you may later may a move that is designed jsut to build enough of your stack to survive.
Ring is the slow, consistent grinding of exploiting your edges in the most profitable way. Certain hands have certain +EV depending on the game situation, and youy play them to their fullest EV. You should never be at risk at not being able to rebuy, so losing your stack is not considered in EV Calculations.
That's why You can 8 table Ring than you can Tournies. You do not have to think about situational problems in the EV. All you really have to understand is the cards, payers, and the current environment at the table.Marm is back, maybe. Been off for 3 years. Rusty as Hell.
Luck is a Residue of Design.
-
03-06-2006 #6
Marm,
I forgot the basic fundamental......If its +EV you make the bet. Else you fold.
Vapor lock dude...vapor lock....simply because of a few bad beats.
Not sure where my head was today.......
Its just soooo different grinding it out. I need the thrill of a tourney from time to time...
-
03-06-2006 #7
I kinda prefer the thrill of ring games now. I ahte playing for 4 hours just to make $10.
How many huge pots do you play (and win) in a tourny for no avail later? Ring, you can walk at any time with your winnings....Marm is back, maybe. Been off for 3 years. Rusty as Hell.
Luck is a Residue of Design.
-
03-07-2006 #8
for ring nl tourney, u have to memorize the betting patterns that most good players will use, and the betting patterns that most fishes use.. scout out which people will chase draws when not given the odds, and which ones wont. this way if ur called down on the flop after u bet potsize with TPTK, and u continue to show strength on the turn with lets say a 3/4 potsize bet, and the guy raises you (and u know this guy doesnt chase against the odds) u can be sure he has a set and has u drawing dead. If ur a tight aggressive player, im guessing that the only hands where u lose money on is when u over play TPTK and other hands similar to that, on the turn and the river, and thus end up pot committing urself when ur drawing dead to the made set.
so just watch out for those instances where u have KQ, limped in from MP.. flop comes K 10 4.. someone else limped in with 44 and hit his set, u bet out potsize on the flop. The guy with the 44 is a tight aggressive player who never chases draws when not given the odds, he ends up just cold calling ur potsize bet on the flop. Turn comes 6, u betout 3/4 potsize on the turn, he min raises you. These are situations u needed to familiarize urself with and make the appropriate laydowns.
also never push all in pf unless u have AA or KK
Last edited by Eclipse86; 03-07-2006 at 03:15 AM.
-
03-07-2006 #9
I think it is cases where I have overplayed TPTK, but all in all it was just my 1st little downturn in ring. I have lost 2 enormous pots (relative to these stakes of course) set over set, and saw my Royal Vegas roll go from $90 down to $16 before a good sesion this morning brought me back up to $34. It wasn't all bad because $30 of the losses were me playing absolutely shitfaced on friday night.
I only play ring on this site because I was using their free $10 as a way to learn cash games. Considering that I have already withdrew $140 from this site after a minimum deposit to clear my winnings, I shouldnt complain. If I go broke here I am still up and can go play Stars where Id rather be anyway (and my bankroll roll is their).
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

