If you play more tables you are less likely to bluff and play more solid poker IMO

Well... Not only does it depend on your comparable win rates, but it also depends on your standard deviation per 100 hands. You really have to combine the 2 to see What would be more profitable. But assuming your Wr /100 hands and SD/100 are both adequate enough to play either level, then you have to look at your $/hr win rate. Yes, the fabled $/hr. Not bb/100 or $/100, but $ per hour as Prof said. It's the only way to compare different levels with different amount of tables.

So the only way you can figure it out is to check to see if you have the bank to play both, and if you do, then which is producing the highest winrate. But the thing that gets me, is you don't have enough to play more than one table at the higher rate do you? IF this is true, you are playing WAY outside your bankroll, and are practically guaranteed to bust out. You should have enough bank to play at least 10 (w/ 100bb buyin) tables at once. If you don't, variance alone will overcome any skill you may have.

Originally Posted by bigboy2020

I just want to play with more quality players who follow more of the unwritten rules of poker.

More fish = good thing.

I'm pretty sure at this point there aren't any rules left unwritten.

If you can't afford to lose like 8 bi's don't bother, keep playing lower limits

[QUOTE=Marm;286832]More fish = good thing.

I SEARCH HIGH AND LOW FOR THEM, but as soon as i get their, theyved just been stacked by a grinder so i spend most my time seraching for them lol

Start tables during busy times, they'll come to you more often.

Originally Posted by KnightofNarg

Start tables during busy times, they'll come to you more often.

Exaclty, grinders stay away from SH tables if they are looking for full ring.