The math of the Stars one makes my head hurt... and it weighted the results based on size of buy-in and size of field. The PP one was used to rate freerolls to win a scholarship to PSOm except the more events you played was weighted heavier than how you actually did in them, but you stil needed to place somewhat well to do ok.
I used to race sailboats in a small yacth club and we used a very simple but effective scoring method.
Whatever place you got, you recieved that many points, so if you came in 6th, you got 6 points. if you came in 4th, etc... If you won, you only got 1/2 point. This was a little bonus for winning. If you DNS'd (Did not Start) you got the size of the field plus 2. If you DNF'd (Did Not Finish, started but puleld out during the race) you got the size of the field plus 1. I only had one DNF, but i had a good excuse, we started doing a really good Titanic imitation. Who ever had the LEAST amount of points at the end of the season, won.
You can easily apply this to a poker club. Each event, give points for their finish, and anybody who missed an event, give them the size of the field plus 2. I really cant think of a DNF scenario, since you just get blinded away.
That would have to be my recomendation.
Last edited by Marm; 02-25-2005 at 09:05 PM.
|